Search for: "STATE v. MELENDEZ"
Results 181 - 200
of 473
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2011, 7:06 am
Last year in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 4:11 pm
Bullcoming v. [read post]
25 Jun 2011, 6:19 pm
In an important gloss on its 2009 decision in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 5:12 pm
As for the state’s contention that the report was not testimonial, Justice Ginsburg noted that the state supreme court had recognized that “Melendez-Diaz left no room for that argument,” and she correctly characterized this conclusion as “inescapable. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 3:52 pm
In 2009, in a case called Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 4:58 am
In another 5-4 decision, though borne of strange bedfellows, the Supreme Court has reversed in Bullcoming v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 3:49 am
New Mexico, the Court narrowly repulsed an attack on Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 5:13 pm
In Melendez-Diaz v Massachusetts (129 S.Ct. 2527 [June 25, 2009]), the United States Supreme Court held that the Confrontation Clause requires that in order for the prosecution to be able to introduce a forensic laboratory report at trial, the prosecutor must present a live witness to testify to the truth of the statements made in the report subject to cross-examination. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 3:32 pm
” Later, in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 2:07 pm
The decision in Bullcoming v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 1:33 pm
For example, one study trying to determine the impact of Mapp v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 12:35 pm
Since the most recent sequel, the 5-4 decision in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 9:28 am
New Mexico, the sequel to Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 8:27 am
The United States Supreme Court issued its decision in Bullcoming v. [read post]
11 Jun 2011, 6:27 pm
United States v. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 12:15 pm
The SJC, following the landmark United States Supreme Court decision in Melendez Diaz v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 2:59 pm
Melendez-Diaz. [read post]
25 May 2011, 2:10 pm
Zeininger´s defense argued that the Constitution´s Sixth Amendment gives people the right to cross-examine the witnesses against them and also referred to a United States Supreme Court case, Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 10:00 pm
In the case of Commonwealth v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 1:07 pm
The United States Supreme Court is expected to release its decision in Bullcoming v. [read post]
