Search for: "STATE v. MELENDEZ"
Results 81 - 100
of 468
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Feb 2015, 1:49 pm
Washington got it right for the most part; Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
21 Feb 2015, 10:17 pm
Washington got it right for the most part; Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
24 Jan 2015, 7:47 am
The video of oral argument before the 9th Circuit in Baca v. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 8:43 pm
Melendez. [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 6:49 am
For example, in Melendez–Diaz v. [read post]
19 Dec 2014, 3:08 am
McNeely, Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 9:34 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Criminal Opinions Body: SC19240 - State v. [read post]
9 Aug 2014, 10:42 am
The other New Jersey case from this week, State v. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 9:55 am
United States (No. 13-127) Walker v. [read post]
19 May 2014, 2:56 pm
Washington, Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
9 May 2014, 11:24 am
(Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 12:40 pm
People v. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 2:53 am
There is a strong semblance between this case and the 2009 decision in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 2:42 pm
The Supreme Court stated in Melendez-Diaz that documents prepared in the regular course of equipment maintenance may well qualify as nontestimonial records. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 1:28 pm
Since Crawford was decided, courts have struggled to come up with a comprehensive definition of the term "testimonial," but one factor that must be considered is the degree to which a statement is deemed accusatory, i.e., whether it seeks to establish facts essential to the elements of the crimes as ruled in People v Encarnacion, Melendez- Diaz v Massachusetts and People v Rawlins. [read post]
28 Nov 2013, 7:40 am
Melendez-Diaz, 129 S. [read post]
9 May 2013, 8:05 am
This revision seems to be a reaction to the Supreme Court’s decision in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
8 May 2013, 8:48 am
This revision is almost certainly a reaction to the Supreme Court’s decision in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 2:16 pm
United States. [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 7:26 am
That case is pending in the Supreme Judicial Court under the caption Commonwealth v. [read post]
