Search for: "STATE v. MELENDEZ"
Results 101 - 120
of 467
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jan 2010, 6:18 pm
State, 913 N.E.2d 703 (Ind. 2009). [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 3:33 pm
As discussed here, in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 8:53 am
Several cases present questions concerning criminal law: Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
6 Jun 2010, 5:40 pm
” On Thursday afternoon, ACCA will hear oral argument in United States v. [read post]
22 Aug 2019, 2:00 am
” Jackson v. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 1:34 pm
The United States Supreme Court's decision in Michigan v. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 10:38 am
This case had been remanded by the Michigan Supreme Court for examination of Confrontation Clause issues in light of the recent United States Supreme Court decision in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 7:41 pm
S. 36 (2004), Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
13 May 2008, 10:41 am
Michigan law prof Richard Friedman summarizes the Melendez-Diaz case, and gives links to the particulars: Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 3:49 am
That was in accordance with Massachusetts law, but five years later, in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 8:27 am
The United States Supreme Court issued its decision in Bullcoming v. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 10:40 am
I have a column that appears today on FindLaw, discussing the Supreme Court's recent decision in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 12:21 pm
In Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
23 Jan 2010, 10:32 am
Massachusetts OUI lawyers are likely to raise 6th Amendment confrontation defenses under Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 3:14 am
The saga of State v. [read post]
5 Mar 2011, 1:20 pm
As the case was pending discretionary review from the New Mexico Supreme Court, the United States Supreme Court issued its Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 9:01 pm
United States v. [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 10:30 am
Lyle Denniston reports on the oral argument in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 10:52 pm
Bullcoming v. [read post]
26 May 2010, 12:58 pm
The introduction of the CHR violate defendant's confrontation rights under Crawford and under Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
