Search for: "STATE v. MEYER" Results 181 - 200 of 775
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2010, 2:13 pm by Gene Quinn
Shortly after State Street the Federal Circuit reaffirmed its decisions in State Street Bank and Alappat in AT&T Corp. v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 2:01 pm by Gritsforbreakfast
See Judge Elsa Alcala's opinion (pdf) on behalf of the majority, a concurrence (pdf) from Judge Tom Price, and a dissent (pdf) from Judge Lawrence Meyers.The case - Wehrenberg v. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 7:40 pm by Brian Shiffrin
” If a juror’s statements during voir dire raise a doubt about his impartiality, such as statements that he has a pre-formed opinion about the case, that juror cannot be permitted to sit unless he states unequivocally that he can be fair and decide the case solely on the evidence adduced at trial (People v Johnson, 17 NY3d 752, 753 [2011]; People v Chambers, 97 NY2d 417, 419 [2002]; People v Arnold, 96 NY2d 358, 362-363 [2001]; People v… [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 9:53 am
There is also a domestic challenge to treaty power in the United States, embodied in Bond v. [read post]
17 Dec 2007, 4:31 am
New York dealt with this recently when a federal judge struck down in Alexanxder v. [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 6:00 am
The Freeman decision also appears to conflict with another case in which the Supreme Court recently granted review, Meyer v. [read post]
27 May 2011, 5:30 am
My home state of Pennsylvania has become a hotbed of social media discovery activity! [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 12:10 pm by Jeff Sovern
My co-author, Dee Pridgen of Wyoming, took time out from updating her treatise to report on a recent New Mexico decision, State ex rel King v. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 6:21 pm
HT Eric Meyer via Twitter for the link to the Complaint; and Donnell Thompson via Facebook for the NBC Sports story. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 2:08 am
Pereira, a social worker, was terminated after making remarks that she, herself, described as a stupid, racist, and unthinking joke.While citing a line of cases that included Pickering v Board of Education, 31 U.S. 563, and Connick v Meyers, 461 U.S. 138, 1983, the Massachusetts high court said that although a public employee’s speech may be entitled to constitutional protection if the employee speaks out on a matter of public concern, and his or her interests as a… [read post]