Search for: "STATE v. MEYER" Results 101 - 120 of 747
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2018, 3:23 pm by Guest Author
The United States Supreme Court today, on Wednesday June 27, 2018, reversed the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals in Janus v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 1:16 am by Jani Ihalainen
Luckily, the CJEU was poised to answer this question in a case that was decided last month.The case of Junek Europ-Vertrieb GmbH v Lohmann & Rauscher International GmbH & Co KG concerned the sale of medical dressings made by Lohmann, sold under the brand "Debrisoft" (TM No. 8852279). [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 1:16 am by Jani Ihalainen
Luckily, the CJEU was poised to answer this question in a case that was decided last month.The case of Junek Europ-Vertrieb GmbH v Lohmann & Rauscher International GmbH & Co KG concerned the sale of medical dressings made by Lohmann, sold under the brand "Debrisoft" (TM No. 8852279). [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 8:37 pm by Kevin LaCroix
While those cases still permeate state and federal courts, large event-driven litigation has become much more common than it was. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 5:27 am by Amy Heerink, Attorney, O'Hagan Meyer
Amy Heerink is an attorney in the Alexandria office of O’Hagan Meyer. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 5:27 am by Amy Heerink, Attorney, O'Hagan Meyer
Amy Heerink is an attorney in the Alexandria office of O’Hagan Meyer. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 5:27 am by Amy Heerink, Attorney, O'Hagan Meyer
Amy Heerink is an attorney in the Alexandria office of O’Hagan Meyer. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 4:18 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
[FN2] Given the [*3]absence of detailed facts, the legal malpractice cause of action should have been dismissed (see Janker v Silver, Forrester & Lesser, P.C., 135 AD3d 908, 910 [2016]; Rodriguez v Jacoby & Meyers, LLP, 126 AD3d at 1185-1186; Kreamer v Town of Oxford, 96 AD3d 1128, 1128 [2012]; compare Soule v Lozada, 232 AD2d 825, 825 [1996]). [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 4:35 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
[FN2] Given the [*3]absence of detailed facts, the legal malpractice cause of action should have been dismissed (see Janker v Silver, Forrester & Lesser, P.C., 135 AD3d 908, 910 [2016]; Rodriguez v Jacoby & Meyers, LLP, 126 AD3d at 1185-1186; Kreamer v Town of Oxford, 96 AD3d 1128, 1128 [2012]; compare Soule v Lozada, 232 AD2d 825, 825 [1996]). [read post]