Search for: "STATE v. McCANN" Results 1 - 20 of 164
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Dec 2016, 1:00 am by Sarah McKeeve, Brodies LLP
Factual background The appellant, Mr Charles McCann has been detained as a patient of the State Hospital, Carstairs since the mid-1990s. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 6:25 am by scanner1
State DA 17-0646 2018 MT 210N Civil – Other Matter of P.F., YINC DA 18-0057 2018 MT 209N Civil – Dependent Neglect Matter of T.F., IV & K.F., YINC DA 18-0056 2018 MT 208N Civil – Dependent Neglect McCann v. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 1:50 am
Summary of Decision issued July 6, 2009Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme Court.Case Name: McCann v. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 2:57 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The Court held that the policy infringed the claimant’s ECHR, art 8 rights to privacy, but that this was not disproportionate and pursued a legitimate aim of protecting public health, and considered that the art 14 challenge failed as the differences in treatment between detained patients in the State Hospital and patients in other NHS facilities or prisoners were a matter of timing rather than policy. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 7:49 am by scanner1
Raelund et al DA 17-0546 2018 MT 134 Civil – Declaratory Judgment State v. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 3:00 am by Dan Frith
The case, decided this week by the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals, is Mayer Hoffman McCann, PC v. [read post]
29 Mar 2014, 4:16 am by J
Now, as you’ll all know, there is a line of European Cases, starting with McCann v UK, taking in Zehentner v Austria and meandering through a range of Croatian cases (Blecic, Orlic, Cosic, etc – see generally, here), which have stated that: the loss of one’s home is a most extreme form of interference with the right to respect for the home. [read post]
29 Mar 2014, 4:16 am by J
Now, as you’ll all know, there is a line of European Cases, starting with McCann v UK, taking in Zehentner v Austria and meandering through a range of Croatian cases (Blecic, Orlic, Cosic, etc – see generally, here), which have stated that: the loss of one’s home is a most extreme form of interference with the right to respect for the home. [read post]