Search for: "STATE v. OKLAHOMA GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY"
Results 1 - 20
of 34
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2012, 1:21 pm
The Appeals Court issued a brief order indicating, "Petitioners, the State of Oklahoma, Oklahoma Industrial Energy Consumers, and the Oklahoma Gas & Electric Company, seek a stay pending review of that portion of the Environmental Protection Agency's final rule requiring the reduction of sulfur dioxide emissions at four electric generating units. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 1:37 pm
The petitioners -- Oklahoma, the Oklahoma Industrial Energy Consumers interest group, and the Oklahoma Gas and Electric Company -- argue that the EPA impermissibly rejected Oklahoma's plan to limit the emissions of sulfur dioxide at Oklahoma Gas and Electric (OG&E) Company power plants and replaced it with its own more stringent regulations, which petitioners contend usurped the… [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 9:56 am
(d/b/a CoServ Electric); Alabama Power Company, Georgia Power Company, and Mississippi Power Company, subsidiaries of Southern Company (NYSE: SO); Oklahoma Gas & Electric Co. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 4:16 pm
Then there was the electric chair, or in some places the gas chamber and the firing squad. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 5:45 am
Key Findings Following the 2018 South Dakota v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 6:12 am
In the late nineteenth and early twentieth century, most states adopted the electric chair or the gas chamber in the belief that these methods were less painful than hanging. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 7:05 am
Nieves v. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 5:39 pm
Oklahoma Gas & Electric has sued the EPA alleging that the EPA rule more stringent than the state’s proposed rule and that implementing those rules would usurp state authority. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 5:39 pm
Oklahoma Gas & Electric has sued the EPA alleging that the EPA rule more stringent than the state’s proposed rule and that implementing those rules would usurp state authority. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 5:39 pm
Oklahoma Gas & Electric has sued the EPA alleging that the EPA rule more stringent than the state’s proposed rule and that implementing those rules would usurp state authority. [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:30 pm
Smitty’s Conoco gas station required to clean up groundwater contamination caused by petroleum spill. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 5:25 pm
GDP.[5] Opponents of the PJM MOPR argue that there are a number of federal benefits for oil and gas producers, including, but not limited to (i) the intangible drilling costs deduction, which allows companies to deduct from taxable income costs incurred from domestic drilling of wells,[6] and (ii) last-in, first-out accounting, which allows fossil fuel companies to reflect lower inventory for purposes of calculating taxable income.[7] Some coal-fired resources… [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 11:58 am
(United States v. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 7:59 pm
Brown and David Matusow, Bahr, et al. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 9:05 pm
Melling pointed to cases such as Fulton v. [read post]
26 Mar 2007, 7:06 am
Most notably, he served for more than a year as lead technology consultant to the major tobacco companies in United States of America v. [read post]
29 Oct 2011, 2:33 pm
http://j.st/GZJ Wyoming v. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 2:39 pm
A state court said no. [read post]
December 14, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
13 Dec 2009, 8:58 pm
Hanley, The Associated Press, December 6, 2009 By executive action, the Obama administration can boost the U.S. target for reducing greenhouse gas emissions beyond levels envisioned in legislation working its way through Congress, the head of the U.N. climate science network said Sunday. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 9:24 am
Click Here DECISIONS Arkema, Inc. v. [read post]
