Search for: "STATE v. PATEL"
Results 1 - 20
of 564
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jun 2012, 1:58 am
Patel and others v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 741; [2012] WLR (D) 174 “The decision of the Secretary of State for the Home Department to refuse an extension of leave to remain in the United Kingdom was not invalidated by the fact that she had made no removal direction in respect of the applicant at the same time as or shortly after the refusal of the extension application.” WLR Daily, 1st June 2012 Source: www.iclr.co.uk [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 1:58 am
Patel and others v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 741; [2012] WLR (D) 174 “The decision of the Secretary of State for the Home Department to refuse an extension of leave to remain in the United Kingdom was not invalidated by the fact that she had made no removal direction in respect of the applicant at the same time as or shortly after the refusal of the extension application.” WLR Daily, 1st June 2012 Source: www.iclr.co.uk [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 5:00 am
In Patel v. [read post]
17 May 2022, 9:29 am
The case was brought by Pankajkumar Patel, an Indian citizen who entered the United States in the 1990s without inspection. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 2:30 am
In Patel it was argued that the Secretary of State’s failure to make a removal decision at the same time, or shortly after, her decision to refuse the appellant leave to remain was unlawful. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 2:30 am
In Patel it was argued that the Secretary of State’s failure to make a removal decision at the same time, or shortly after, her decision to refuse the appellant leave to remain was unlawful. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 2:30 am
On appeal from: [2017] EWCA Civ 2028 These appeals raised common issues regarding the scope of the Ruiz Zambrano v Office national de l’emploi (Case C-34/09) [2012] QB 265 (“Zambrano”) principle which states that a non-member state national (“TCN”) parent of a European Union citizen child resident within the EU is entitled to reside in the EU. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm
The standard the City urged for reviewing a facial challenge used language from United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 2:07 pm
In a recent 11th Circuit Court of Appeals decision, Warrington v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 7:50 am
Patel confirmed this as a good term for Fourth Amendment rights, joining Grady v. [read post]
21 May 2019, 5:23 am
However, both tiers of the tribunal dismissed Mr Patel’s appeal. [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 7:40 am
Patel v. 7-Eleven, Inc., No. [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 7:40 am
Patel v. 7-Eleven, Inc., No. [read post]
2 Mar 2008, 3:06 pm
In Patel v. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 9:39 pm
(photo credit) Geeta V. [read post]
28 Dec 2020, 11:08 pm
Para 17-19 of Vidya Drolia v Durga Trading Corporation is the next interesting aspect we take up in this post. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 2:44 pm
Ochoa-Hernandez v. [read post]
15 Mar 2022, 8:47 am
Today's advance release criminal law opinion: State v. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 11:03 am
Patel Davis v. [read post]
