Search for: "STATE v. QURESHI" Results 1 - 20 of 28
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Feb 2014, 6:46 am
Contents include:Leon E Trakman, The Status of Investor - State Arbitration: Resolving Investment Disputes under the Transpacific Partnership AgreementBroussolle Damien, Service, Trade in Services and Trade of Services IndustriesLucas Bastin, Transfer Pricing and the WTO Pablo Zapatero Miguel, Trade in Generics v. [read post]
23 May 2019, 4:26 am by CMS
Omar Qureshi, Dan Tench and Cathryn Hopkins of CMS comment on the decision which was handed down on 15 May 2019 by the UK Supreme Court in the matter of R (on the application of Privacy International) v Investigatory Powers Tribunal and others [2019] UKSC 22:  On 15 May 2019, the Supreme Court handed down its judgment, deciding by a slim majority of 4:3 that an “ouster clause” in section 67(8) of the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 (“RIPA”)… [read post]
24 Feb 2021, 12:38 am by CMS
Background The appellant – KBR, Inc – was a company incorporated in the United States. [read post]
22 May 2019, 4:58 pm by INFORRM
In Lord Carnwath’s view, the provision in s.67(8) RIPA for a route of appeal to the Secretary of State did not add anything, given that that power had not been exercised and was ultimately an executive power, so did not support the argument that the courts should not have ultimate control [104]. [read post]
24 Mar 2019, 7:47 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
In R v Belnavis the Supreme Court stated that “the reasons for this principle of deference are apparent and compelling. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 12:37 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUITCriminal Practice Court's Reliance on Record, Including Presentence Report, Was Adequate Basis for Imposed Sentence United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 6:08 am by Will Aitchison
Feb.13, 2009) (plaintiffs’ allegations they routinely worked more than forty hours per week, were not paid overtime compensation, and were covered employees were sufficient to state a claim); Qureshi v. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 7:17 pm
Before getting to the substance of this post, I want to join Vikram and V. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 7:13 am by emagraken
It does not appear that there has been any further consideration by the Court of Appeal. [45] In their submissions the defendants also cite Qureshi (Guardian ad litem of) v. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 6:59 am by Hanibal Goitom
Eight states and four union territo [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 1:48 pm by
By Zameer Qureshi On November 23, 2016, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) issued two landmark judgments in Case C-673/13 P (Commission v Stichting Greenpeace Nederland and Pan Europe) and Case C-442/14 (Bayer CropScience and Stichting De Bijenstichting v College voor de toelating van gewasbeschermingsmiddelen en biociden). [read post]
27 Nov 2022, 4:38 pm by INFORRM
On 25 November 2022, judgment was handed down in favour of the claimant in the defamation claim of Gooderson v Qureshi [2022] EWHC 2977 (KB). [read post]