Search for: "STATE v. SUEING"
Results 21 - 40
of 13,450
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Apr 2025, 11:53 am
” City of Miami v. [read post]
11 Apr 2025, 1:08 pm
Judge sues the Commission under the First Amendment. [read post]
10 Apr 2025, 9:27 am
Padilla One More Time: Facebook Isn’t a State Actor–Atkinson v. [read post]
9 Apr 2025, 4:05 am
In Schroeder v. [read post]
8 Apr 2025, 12:25 pm
One needs an express cause of action to sue the federal government absent Bivens, and if one has an express cause of action, under the recent Supreme Court decision Department of Agriculture Rural Development Rural Housing Service v. [read post]
8 Apr 2025, 8:44 am
Longarzo * DMCA’s Unhelpful 512(f) Preempts Helpful State Law Claims–Stevens v. [read post]
7 Apr 2025, 10:33 am
Her recent vote in Department of State v. [read post]
7 Apr 2025, 5:00 am
In 2020’s Seila Law LLC v. [read post]
5 Apr 2025, 9:08 am
S.A. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2025, 4:58 am
In Stumacher v Medical Liab. [read post]
4 Apr 2025, 4:40 am
In Camp v. [read post]
3 Apr 2025, 9:28 am
See United States v. [read post]
3 Apr 2025, 4:05 am
The complaint (full text) in State of Oklahoma ex rel Oklahoma State Department of Education v. [read post]
2 Apr 2025, 3:41 pm
Although the government now contends that it had changed its position after the court’s decision in Health and Hospital Corporation of Marion County, Ind. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2025, 1:54 pm
Supreme Court declined to hold, in FTC v. [read post]
2 Apr 2025, 8:21 am
Judge Leon stated, “There is no doubt this retaliatory action chills speech and legal advocacy, and that is qualified as a constitutional harm. [read post]
2 Apr 2025, 6:38 am
Following the opinion announcements, the court will hear oral arguments in Medina v. [read post]
1 Apr 2025, 1:45 pm
University of Michigan Law School (via Getty)It didn’t take long after SFFA v. [read post]
1 Apr 2025, 11:02 am
” Pointing to the Supreme Court’s 2022 decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
1 Apr 2025, 8:28 am
Republicans, like the abolitionists before them, swore by Worcester v. [read post]
