Search for: "STATE v. SUEING" Results 381 - 400 of 14,918
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jul 2009, 12:00 am
The complaint (full text) in Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. [read post]
6 Feb 2008, 2:46 pm
For background, see Marc Randazza's two posts on the subject:Jeb Corliss Sues Empire State Building and Jeb Corliss Lawsuit Update (with video).Jeb Corliss, it seems, is a moron of the first degree. [read post]
Gulyás stated that Hungary has a claim after the EC reimbursed other Schengen border states. [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 1:20 pm by Allan Blutstein
Dep't of State (D.D.C.) -- permitting plaintiff to amend Complaint to allege that agency has policy or practice of forcing requesters to sue to obtain FOIA responses. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 3:00 am by Steve Clowney
Most notably, the Supreme Court’s decision in Massachusetts v.... [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 12:05 pm
The Supreme Court made it harder for consumers to sue manufacturers of federally-approved medical devices when it ruled in Riegel v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 7:54 am
The Connecticut decision had given standing to several U.S. states, the city of New York and private land trusts to sue AEP for nuissance arising from the production of greenhouse gases. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 9:53 am by Mark S. Sidoti and Daniel S. Weinberger
During its next term, the United States Supreme Court will review the First Circuit Court of Appeals’s holding in Acheson Hotels, LLC v. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 9:53 am by Mark S. Sidoti and Daniel S. Weinberger
During its next term, the United States Supreme Court will review the First Circuit Court of Appeals’s holding in Acheson Hotels, LLC v. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 9:53 am by Mark S. Sidoti and Daniel S. Weinberger
During its next term, the United States Supreme Court will review the First Circuit Court of Appeals’s holding in Acheson Hotels, LLC v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 11:13 am by James R. Copland
In AEP, the justices split 4-4 on whether the plaintiffs had standing to sue (presumably the same split as in Massachusetts v. [read post]