Search for: "STATE v. SY" Results 1 - 20 of 1,500
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2017, 7:42 am by Evidence ProfBlogger
Maybe the most important exchange from the recent oral arguments in the Adnan Syed case was this one: State 17 With her question, Judge Graeff clearly appears to be referencing the Supreme Court's recent opinion in Wearry v. [read post]
28 Feb 2017, 4:01 am by Evidence ProfBlogger
Following up on yesterday's post, the second case cited by the State in its Brief of Appellant in the Adnan Syed case in the ineffective assistance/cell tower claim was Henry v. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 12:49 pm by Suraj Vyas
Well, I have a new development for you: Earlier today, the Court of Appeals (Maryland's highest court) granted a writ of certiorari (meaning they granted review) in State of Maryland v. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 12:51 am by Paul Caron
Kudos to Colin Miller, editor of our EvidenceProf Blog, for following up on his wildly successful series of posts on the Serial Podcast about the prosecution of Adnan Syed with Undisclosed, a series of podcasts on the case (blogged here and here): The Undisclosed Podcast is a listening experience that... [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 5:52 am by Evidence ProfBlogger
Today, the United States Supreme Court will consider Adnan Syed's petition for writ of certiorari. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 8:55 am by Evidence ProfBlogger
I've written about a lot of Maryland precedent on this blog in connection with the Adnan Syed case. [read post]
24 Aug 2018, 5:58 am by Evidence ProfBlogger
Pinholster, 563 U.S. 170 (U.S. 2011), the Supreme Court case the State cites extensively in its brief in the Adnan Syed case. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 5:08 am
State not bound by misinformation provided by a State employee relied upon by the aggrieved individualMatter of Lewandowski v New York State & Local Police & Fire Retirement Sys., 2010 NY Slip Op 00050, decided on January 7, 2010, Appellate Division, Third Department Paul Lewandowski sustained a disabling injury while working as a firefighter. [read post]
14 May 2008, 6:10 pm
"2) The decision in Wickard v. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 9:13 am by Hakemi
For the British Columbia Court of Appeal’s judgments in the Pro-Sys and Sun-Rype cases see: Pro-Sys Consultants Ltd. v. [read post]