Search for: "STEELE v. STEELE" Results 21 - 40 of 2,723
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Sep 2021, 12:57 pm by Larry
That is because after the CIT issued its decision in PrimeSource, the Federal Circuit decided Transpacific Steel LLC v. [read post]
30 Aug 2021, 5:11 pm by Larry
This all comes up in the context of Voestalpine USA Corp and Bilstein Cold Rolled Steel LP v. [read post]
18 Aug 2021, 5:41 am by Unreported Opinions
Contract — Subcontract — Mechanic’s lien This appeal involves the scope and performance of a structural and miscellaneous steel subcontract between Buffalo Structural Steel Construction Corporation (“Buffalo”), appellee, and the general contractor, Whiting-Turner Contracting Company (“WhitingTurner”), appellant, for the construction of a grocery distribution center for LIDL US Operations, LLC (“Lidl”), appellant. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" However, said the Commissioner, the "does not affect my conclusion that petitioners’ claims here — such as the disparate impact of hiring practices like “word of mouth” referrals – are more appropriately resolved by a fair employment practice agency or a court of competent jurisdiction," citing Grant v Bethlehem Steel Corp., 635 F2d 1007. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" However, said the Commissioner, the "does not affect my conclusion that petitioners’ claims here — such as the disparate impact of hiring practices like “word of mouth” referrals – are more appropriately resolved by a fair employment practice agency or a court of competent jurisdiction," citing Grant v Bethlehem Steel Corp., 635 F2d 1007. [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Whether a claim has been filed in a timely manner presents a factual issue for the Board to resolve, and such determination, if supported by substantial evidence in the record as a whole, will not be disturbed" (Matter of Kasic v Bethlehem Steel Corp., 94 AD3d 1349. [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Whether a claim has been filed in a timely manner presents a factual issue for the Board to resolve, and such determination, if supported by substantial evidence in the record as a whole, will not be disturbed" (Matter of Kasic v Bethlehem Steel Corp., 94 AD3d 1349. [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Whether a claim has been filed in a timely manner presents a factual issue for the Board to resolve, and such determination, if supported by substantial evidence in the record as a whole, will not be disturbed" (Matter of Kasic v Bethlehem Steel Corp., 94 AD3d 1349. [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Whether a claim has been filed in a timely manner presents a factual issue for the Board to resolve, and such determination, if supported by substantial evidence in the record as a whole, will not be disturbed" (Matter of Kasic v Bethlehem Steel Corp., 94 AD3d 1349. [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Whether a claim has been filed in a timely manner presents a factual issue for the Board to resolve, and such determination, if supported by substantial evidence in the record as a whole, will not be disturbed" (Matter of Kasic v Bethlehem Steel Corp., 94 AD3d 1349. [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Whether a claim has been filed in a timely manner presents a factual issue for the Board to resolve, and such determination, if supported by substantial evidence in the record as a whole, will not be disturbed" (Matter of Kasic v Bethlehem Steel Corp., 94 AD3d 1349. [read post]