Search for: "STEELE v. STEELE" Results 41 - 60 of 2,656
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Aug 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Whether a claim has been filed in a timely manner presents a factual issue for the Board to resolve, and such determination, if supported by substantial evidence in the record as a whole, will not be disturbed" (Matter of Kasic v Bethlehem Steel Corp., 94 AD3d 1349. [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Whether a claim has been filed in a timely manner presents a factual issue for the Board to resolve, and such determination, if supported by substantial evidence in the record as a whole, will not be disturbed" (Matter of Kasic v Bethlehem Steel Corp., 94 AD3d 1349. [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Whether a claim has been filed in a timely manner presents a factual issue for the Board to resolve, and such determination, if supported by substantial evidence in the record as a whole, will not be disturbed" (Matter of Kasic v Bethlehem Steel Corp., 94 AD3d 1349. [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Whether a claim has been filed in a timely manner presents a factual issue for the Board to resolve, and such determination, if supported by substantial evidence in the record as a whole, will not be disturbed" (Matter of Kasic v Bethlehem Steel Corp., 94 AD3d 1349. [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Whether a claim has been filed in a timely manner presents a factual issue for the Board to resolve, and such determination, if supported by substantial evidence in the record as a whole, will not be disturbed" (Matter of Kasic v Bethlehem Steel Corp., 94 AD3d 1349. [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Whether a claim has been filed in a timely manner presents a factual issue for the Board to resolve, and such determination, if supported by substantial evidence in the record as a whole, will not be disturbed" (Matter of Kasic v Bethlehem Steel Corp., 94 AD3d 1349. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 5:45 am by Chris Williams
[ABA Journal] * Surprising no one, Mississippi AG asks SCOTUS to revisit Roe v. [read post]
20 Jul 2021, 9:08 pm by Hannah Pugh
Supreme Court has revisited protections for religious freedom through Fulton v. [read post]
14 Jul 2021, 6:17 am by Joseph D. Kearney
The Parens Patriae Model In 1892, in Illinois Central Railroad Co. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2021, 1:24 am by Donald Dinnie
Referring to Van Reenen Steel (Pty) Ltd v Smith NO and Transnet v Rubenstein, the Labour Appeal Court held that the principle on common mistake is more correctly formulated as requiring three elements to be proven: the contract was based on a common assumption; the assumption was incorrect; and the subject matter of the assumption was vital to the transaction – in other words, had both parties been aware of the true position the transaction would not have… [read post]