Search for: "STEPHENSON v. STEPHENSON" Results 101 - 120 of 257
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Mar 2018, 11:24 am by Kirsten Mikadze
Application to environmental prosecutions The Ontario Court of Justice ruling in R v Stephenson Rental Services (a prosecution under the Occupational Health and Safety Act) provided some clarity by confirming that the ceilings established in R v Jordan apply to the prosecution of regulatory offences where the accused is a corporation as opposed to a natural person. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 12:19 pm by Nicandro Iannacci
On September 1, 1966, Chief Judge Roy Stephenson of the U.S. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 3:18 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Davis v R [2010] EWCA Crim 708 (31 March 2010) Greaves & Ors v R [2010] EWCA Crim 709 (31 March 2010) Delucca, R v [2010] EWCA Crim 710 (31 March 2010) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Valentines Homes & Construction Ltd, R (on the application of) v HM Revenue and Customs [2010] EWCA Civ 345 (31 March 2010) Servier Laboratories Ltd v National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence & Anor [2010] EWCA… [read post]
6 Nov 2007, 2:46 am
Mesienheimer, of Martindell, Swearer & Shaffer, won in State v. [read post]
13 Jun 2010, 4:10 pm by tjsllibrary
Considerable emphasis is placed upon the twentieth century, especially the period since the 1972 Furman v. [read post]
31 May 2016, 7:24 am by Dennis Crouch
 Although scheduled for conference, the court took no action in the Cuozzo follow-on case of Stephenson v. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 11:01 am
Judgment Released:  July 6, 2010   Link to Judgment On a motion for summary judgment, “the issue before the court is not how the matter should be resolved, but whether there is a triable issue. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
A plaintiff alleging discrimination in violation of the NYSHRL must establish that (1) he or she is a member of a protected class, (2) he or she was qualified to hold the position, (3) he or she suffered an adverse employment action, and (4) the adverse action occurred under circumstances giving rise to an inference of discrimination (see Stephenson v Hotel Empls. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
A plaintiff alleging discrimination in violation of the NYSHRL must establish that (1) he or she is a member of a protected class, (2) he or she was qualified to hold the position, (3) he or she suffered an adverse employment action, and (4) the adverse action occurred under circumstances giving rise to an inference of discrimination (see Stephenson v Hotel Empls. [read post]