Search for: "STEVENS v. ROGERS" Results 1 - 20 of 323
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Apr 2007, 8:04 am
As Roger Pielke Jr. points out at Prometheus, there is a scientific error in Justice Stevens' Massachusetts v. [read post]
3 May 2016, 2:16 pm by scanner1
.; and ROGER and CARRIE PETERS, Plaintiffs, Appellees, and Cross-Appellants, v. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 8:56 am by library
  Two of the more notable features include Stevens holding a golf club to represent his majority opinion in PGA Tour, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 7:32 am
Steven sure has generated a lot of news recently.First, there's the $22.5 billion Bank of New York Russian customs case, which settled for $14 million (prior coverage here).Then there was Judge Huck's ruling in the Dole matter, which has a number of facts that aren't too hot, as noted by CNNMoney's Roger Parloff:The broad terms of Huck's ruling make its reasoning virtually certain to control the outcome of a companion DBCP case known as Herrera Rios… [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 6:00 am by Roger Alford
by Roger Alford On Monday, October 24, I’ll be participating in a panel discussion at NYU on the The Implications of Chevron v. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 6:51 am by texasbar
John Albach's "End of the World" contributions that appeared in the January 2000 column spawned two contributions of unusual, but very "nice" contract provisions:(1) From Jack Hazlewood of Amarillo, who years ago "happened to stumble on to Roy Rogers' contract with his movie studio (or maybe his agent)" in Nichols Encyclopedia of Legal Forms, this clause buried "deep in the fine print":Actor [Roy Rogers] shall never in performance… [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 5:59 am by texasbar
John Albach's "End of the World" contributions that appeared in the January 2000 column spawned two contributions of unusual, but very "nice" contract provisions:(1) From Jack Hazlewood of Amarillo, who years ago "happened to stumble on to Roy Rogers' contract with his movie studio (or maybe his agent)" in Nichols Encyclopedia of Legal Forms, this clause buried "deep in the fine print":Actor [Roy Rogers] shall never in performance… [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 7:31 am by David Markus
Stevens was seated next to the famed dancer and actress Ginger Rogers. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 4:15 pm by Kathryn Rubino
[Cityland] * A profile of Justice John Stevens that focuses on his love of baseball and his dissent in Bush v. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 4:43 am by Dennis Crouch
Justice Stevens wrote the majority opinion for the Court in Parker v. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 1:00 am
The Return of the Forces of Light v. the Powers of Darkness - March 2000John Albach's "End of the World" contributions that appeared in the January 2000 column spawned two contributions of unusual, but very "nice" contract provisions:(1) From Jack Hazlewood of Amarillo, who years ago "happened to stumble on to Roy Rogers' contract with his movie studio (or maybe his agent)" in Nichols Encyclopedia of Legal Forms, this clause buried "deep… [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 9:30 am by azatty
Law Professors Toni Massaro and Barbara Atwood will speak on a panel with attorney Steven Phillips about the Supreme Court decisions in Windsor v. [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 9:30 am by azatty
Law Professors Toni Massaro and Barbara Atwood will speak on a panel with attorney Steven Phillips about the Supreme Court decisions in Windsor v. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Simson, The Uncertain Good of Overruling Employment Division v. [read post]
20 May 2015, 6:55 am by Amy Howe
At their private Conference tomorrow, the Justices will consider the petition in Fisher v. [read post]