Search for: "STEWART v. STATE" Results 21 - 40 of 2,201
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Mar 2018, 6:47 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Illegal sentence — Need for a hearing In June 2011, a jury in the Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County convicted Timothy Stewart, appellant, of two counts of second-degree rape, three counts of second degree sexual offense, four counts of third-degree sexual offense, sexual abuse of a minor, and unnatural and perverted ... [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 4:59 pm by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Illegal sentence — Sentence exceeds terms of plea agreement Edward Stanley Stewart, III, appellant, filed a motion to correct an illegal sentence in the Circuit Court for Charles County in which he alleged that his sentence for third-degree sex offense exceeded the sentencing terms of a binding plea agreement and was therefore ... [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 6:10 pm by Dwight Sullivan
As Bob McCarty reports here,  ACCA today rejected the appeal and petition for new trial in United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 5:15 am by Sandy
The decision denying rehearing en banc in United States v. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 10:42 am by lennyesq
Fahringer told the circuit panel hearing United States v. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 5:00 am
In other words if the government thinks your client is a reprehensible terrorist you are not supposed to give him/her the zealous representation that the Code of Professional Conduct and state law demands. [read post]
7 Oct 2012, 9:08 am by Contributor
Here’s what Jon Stewart had to say about the Supreme Court of the United States decision in Florence v. [read post]
7 Oct 2012, 9:08 am by Contributor
Here’s what Jon Stewart had to say about the Supreme Court of the United States decision in Florence v. [read post]
24 Nov 2009, 5:46 am by Bernard Hibbitts
The maximum sentence under the federal sentencing Guidelines is 30 years but the Supreme Court held in United States v. [read post]
20 May 2007, 11:05 pm by Denese Dominguez
It is the failure of the trial court to ask the questions on the amended voir dire request that is the subject of this appeal.In Maryland, the sole purpose of voir dire is to ensure a fair and impartial jury by determining the existence of cause for disqualification and not, as in many other states, to include the intelligent exercise of preemptory challenges. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 1:26 pm by WIMS
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. [read post]