Search for: "STEWART v. STATE" Results 561 - 580 of 2,307
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Nov 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Footnote 2 in Stewart states: Consistent with its statutory purpose, the Sheriff's resort to Civil Service Law §71 was presumably 'to secure a steady, reliable, and adequate work force' (Matter of Duncan v New York State Dev. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 5:45 am by Christine Nielsen
State Senator Stewart Greenleaf (R-Montgomery/Bucks), with the cooperation of Pennsylvania Attorney General Kathleen Kane, is reintroducing comprehensive antitrust legislation - Senate Bill 1565 - that stalled in the judiciary committee during the last legislative session. [read post]
29 Aug 2007, 10:24 pm
Stewart, Estes, & Donnell, Aug. 20 (PDF)). [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 12:08 pm by Trevor Cutaiar
Caldwell argued that the Benoit court’s finding that the vessel had been indefinitely moored was not the standard created the United States Supreme Court in Stewart v. [read post]
26 Oct 2007, 2:03 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Neil Martin Ltd v HM Revenue & Customs [2007] EWCA Civ 1041 (25 October 2007) Cadogan & Anor v Sportelli & Anor [2007] EWCA Civ 1042 (25 October 2007) Boudh v Bodh [2007] EWCA Civ 1019 (25 October 2007) AA (Somalia) v SSHD [2007] EWCA Civ 1040 (25 October 2007) Kohn v Wagschal & Ors [2007] EWCA Civ 1022 (24 October 2007) Poole & Ors v HM Treasury [2007] EWCA Civ 1021… [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 1:59 pm
  Tony Mauro in this post provides the story: In a brief order on today's order list the Supreme Court dashed the hopes of gun rights advocates who hoped to have two lawyers and additional time arguing their cause before the Supreme Court when it hears arguments in the historic case D.C. v. [read post]
Solicitor General Stewart responded to the question stating that the government “would probably say that. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 6:00 am by Jon Robinson
The question of whether a gambling boat is a vessel is an offshoot of the Supreme Court’s decision in Stewart v. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 11:59 am by Amy Howe
”  So the Justices also pressed Deputy Solicitor General Malcolm Stewart, who argued on behalf of the United States, to articulate a rule that would spare cloud computing from liability. [read post]
1 May 2015, 6:55 am
Stewart, 143 Wis.2d 28, 420 N.W. 2d 44 (Wisconsin Supreme Court 1988). [read post]