Search for: "STOCKER v. STOCKER"
Results 1 - 20
of 128
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Apr 2019, 2:31 am
An ordinary reader of the post would have interpreted the post as meaning that Mr Stocker had grasped Mrs Stocker by the throat and applied force to her neck. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 3:17 am
He relied on the 1891 decision of Pullman v Hill, which involved the plaintiff’s clerk opening a letter intended only for him. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 12:08 am
Today, 24 January 2019, five Supreme Court judges (Lord Reed, Lord Kerr, Lady Black, Lord Briggs and Lord Kitchin) will hear Stocker v Stocker UKSC 2018/0045, an appeal against the 12 February 2018 Court of Appeal decision of Lady Justice Sharp, with whom Lord Justice McFarlane and Sir John Laws concurred ([2018] EWCA Civ 170). [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 7:19 pm
On 3 April 2019 the Supreme Court gave its judgment in Stocker v Stocker [2019] UKSC 17. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 1:31 am
Today, 24 January 2019, five Supreme Court judges (Lord Reed, Lord Kerr, Lady Black, Lord Briggs and Lord Kitchin) will hear Stocker v Stocker UKSC 2018/0045, an appeal against the 12 February 2018 Court of Appeal decision of Lady Justice Sharp, with whom Lord Justice McFarlane and Sir John Laws concurred ([2018] EWCA Civ 170). [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 8:00 am
But inexplicably the company failed to accommodate those requests, causing the impacted individuals to resign.Believing that such conduct violated the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), the EEOC filed suit (EEOC v. [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 7:00 am
In Stocker v. [read post]
9 Aug 2015, 10:00 pm
Mr Justice Warby in Stocker v Stocker [2015] EWHC 1634 at paragraph 63: “Witness statements are meant to be in the witness’s own words, and an assistant solicitor should be able to do the majority of the work” [read post]
20 Oct 2015, 10:02 pm
It has been suggested that in the case of Stocker v Stocker [2015] EWHC 1634 the most interesting observation by Mr Justice Warby was: “I readily acknowledge the importance of ensuring that the costs budgeting process does not result in … Continue reading → [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 7:05 am
Because she failed to make out a prima facie case of discrimination, she could not prove that Walmart failed to accommodate her disability, ruled the Eighth Circuit, affirming summary judgment against her ADA and state-law disability bias claims (Kelleher v. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 4:52 pm
Some practitioners were surprised that Stocker v Stocker [2019] UKSC 17 reached the country’s highest court. [read post]
7 Apr 2019, 4:03 pm
On 3 April 2019 the Supreme Court handed down judgment in the libel appeal of Stocker v Stocker ([2019] UKSC 17). [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 8:44 am
Moreover, a supervisor’s alleged statement that that “[s]he could do more when she was younger than she can now” was a stray remark and not tied to his firing (Dominick v Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., March 16, 2015, Teilborg, J.). [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 7:13 am
In this current opinion in the matter of Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 10:22 am
The case is entitled Kennedy v. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 6:37 am
The plaintiff applied to be a stocker in Lowe’s Honolulu store. [read post]
20 Apr 2019, 4:08 pm
This term there was one Supreme Court media law judgment, in Stocker v Stocker ([2019] UKSC 17) – in which the appeal was allowed and the finding was in favour of the defendant. [read post]
10 Jan 2016, 4:33 pm
Stocker v Stocker 29 February 2016, Trial, listed for 7 days (see the interim decision in June 2015 [2015] EWHC 1634 (QB)). [read post]
6 Apr 2019, 3:15 am
Bragg Creek v Tyco Integrated 2019 ABQB 226 https://t.co/zZ0mEsFTxp 2019-04-05 Letter to the Copyright Office on IT modernization status in light of the Fourth Estate decision https://t.co/uF1oGnu5Qk 2019-04-05 Case Law: Stocker v Stocker, Supreme Court overturns Judge on meaning of “tried to strangle” https://t.co/YOOlp3CNSc 2019-04-05 Open Banking & Data Ownership https://t.co/gLrAvzpLjW 2019-04-05 Blogger’s Screenshot of a Newspaper Page… [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 1:00 am
Stocker v Stocker, heard 24 Jan 2019. [read post]
