Search for: "STOCKER v. STOCKER" Results 1 - 20 of 121
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Apr 2019, 2:31 am by Anthony Fairclough
An ordinary reader of the post would have interpreted the post as meaning that Mr Stocker had grasped Mrs Stocker by the throat and applied force to her neck. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 3:17 am by INFORRM
  He relied on the 1891 decision of Pullman v Hill, which involved the plaintiff’s clerk opening a letter intended only for him. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 12:08 am by INFORRM
Today, 24 January 2019, five Supreme Court judges (Lord Reed, Lord Kerr, Lady Black, Lord Briggs and Lord Kitchin) will hear Stocker v Stocker UKSC 2018/0045, an appeal against the 12 February 2018 Court of Appeal decision of Lady Justice Sharp, with whom Lord Justice McFarlane and Sir John Laws concurred ([2018] EWCA Civ 170). [read post]
Today, 24 January 2019, five Supreme Court judges (Lord Reed, Lord Kerr, Lady Black, Lord Briggs and Lord Kitchin) will hear Stocker v Stocker UKSC 2018/0045, an appeal against the 12 February 2018 Court of Appeal decision of Lady Justice Sharp, with whom Lord Justice McFarlane and Sir John Laws concurred ([2018] EWCA Civ 170). [read post]
9 Aug 2015, 10:00 pm by Simon Gibbs
Mr Justice Warby in Stocker v Stocker [2015] EWHC 1634 at paragraph 63: “Witness statements are meant to be in the witness’s own words, and an assistant solicitor should be able to do the majority of the work” [read post]
20 Oct 2015, 10:02 pm by Simon Gibbs
It has been suggested that in the case of Stocker v Stocker [2015] EWHC 1634 the most interesting observation by Mr Justice Warby was: “I readily acknowledge the importance of ensuring that the costs budgeting process does not result in … Continue reading → [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 7:05 am by Joy Waltemath
Because she failed to make out a prima facie case of discrimination, she could not prove that Walmart failed to accommodate her disability, ruled the Eighth Circuit, affirming summary judgment against her ADA and state-law disability bias claims (Kelleher v. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 4:52 pm by INFORRM
Some practitioners were surprised that Stocker v Stocker [2019] UKSC 17 reached the country’s highest court. [read post]
7 Apr 2019, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
On 3 April 2019 the Supreme Court handed down judgment in the libel appeal of Stocker v Stocker ([2019] UKSC 17). [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 8:44 am by Joy Waltemath
Moreover, a supervisor’s alleged statement that that “[s]he could do more when she was younger than she can now” was a stray remark and not tied to his firing (Dominick v Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., March 16, 2015, Teilborg, J.). [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 12:00 am
Or something.Parental truce - Sometimes warring parents can put their differences aside, as in Y (A Child) (Private Law).Finality of litigation - The principle, as demonstrated in the recently published judgment in Stocker v Stocker.Perpetual parental conflict - Sometimes parents can't put their differences aside, as in the case T (A Child) (Suspension of Contact).Have a good weekend. [read post]
20 Apr 2019, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
This term there was one Supreme Court media law judgment, in Stocker v Stocker ([2019] UKSC 17) – in which the appeal was allowed and the finding was in favour of the defendant. [read post]
10 Jan 2016, 4:33 pm by INFORRM
Stocker v Stocker 29 February 2016, Trial, listed for 7 days (see the interim decision in June 2015 [2015] EWHC 1634 (QB)). [read post]
6 Apr 2019, 3:15 am by Barry Sookman
Bragg Creek v Tyco Integrated 2019 ABQB 226 https://t.co/zZ0mEsFTxp 2019-04-05 Letter to the Copyright Office on IT modernization status in light of the Fourth Estate decision https://t.co/uF1oGnu5Qk 2019-04-05 Case Law: Stocker v Stocker, Supreme Court overturns Judge on meaning of “tried to strangle” https://t.co/YOOlp3CNSc 2019-04-05 Open Banking & Data Ownership https://t.co/gLrAvzpLjW 2019-04-05 Blogger’s Screenshot of a Newspaper Page… [read post]