Search for: "STOCKER v. STOCKER"
Results 1 - 20
of 124
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Apr 2019, 2:31 am
An ordinary reader of the post would have interpreted the post as meaning that Mr Stocker had grasped Mrs Stocker by the throat and applied force to her neck. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 3:17 am
He relied on the 1891 decision of Pullman v Hill, which involved the plaintiff’s clerk opening a letter intended only for him. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 12:08 am
Today, 24 January 2019, five Supreme Court judges (Lord Reed, Lord Kerr, Lady Black, Lord Briggs and Lord Kitchin) will hear Stocker v Stocker UKSC 2018/0045, an appeal against the 12 February 2018 Court of Appeal decision of Lady Justice Sharp, with whom Lord Justice McFarlane and Sir John Laws concurred ([2018] EWCA Civ 170). [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 7:19 pm
On 3 April 2019 the Supreme Court gave its judgment in Stocker v Stocker [2019] UKSC 17. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 1:31 am
Today, 24 January 2019, five Supreme Court judges (Lord Reed, Lord Kerr, Lady Black, Lord Briggs and Lord Kitchin) will hear Stocker v Stocker UKSC 2018/0045, an appeal against the 12 February 2018 Court of Appeal decision of Lady Justice Sharp, with whom Lord Justice McFarlane and Sir John Laws concurred ([2018] EWCA Civ 170). [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 8:00 am
But inexplicably the company failed to accommodate those requests, causing the impacted individuals to resign.Believing that such conduct violated the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), the EEOC filed suit (EEOC v. [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 7:00 am
In Stocker v. [read post]
9 Aug 2015, 10:00 pm
Mr Justice Warby in Stocker v Stocker [2015] EWHC 1634 at paragraph 63: “Witness statements are meant to be in the witness’s own words, and an assistant solicitor should be able to do the majority of the work” [read post]
20 Oct 2015, 10:02 pm
It has been suggested that in the case of Stocker v Stocker [2015] EWHC 1634 the most interesting observation by Mr Justice Warby was: “I readily acknowledge the importance of ensuring that the costs budgeting process does not result in … Continue reading → [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 4:52 pm
Some practitioners were surprised that Stocker v Stocker [2019] UKSC 17 reached the country’s highest court. [read post]
7 Apr 2019, 4:03 pm
On 3 April 2019 the Supreme Court handed down judgment in the libel appeal of Stocker v Stocker ([2019] UKSC 17). [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 7:13 am
In this current opinion in the matter of Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 10:22 am
The case is entitled Kennedy v. [read post]
20 Apr 2019, 4:08 pm
This term there was one Supreme Court media law judgment, in Stocker v Stocker ([2019] UKSC 17) – in which the appeal was allowed and the finding was in favour of the defendant. [read post]
19 Aug 2024, 12:43 pm
” In May 2022, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals (CCA) confronted a contentious case, State v. [read post]
19 Aug 2024, 5:43 pm
” In May 2022, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals (CCA) confronted a contentious case, State v. [read post]
10 Jan 2016, 4:33 pm
Stocker v Stocker 29 February 2016, Trial, listed for 7 days (see the interim decision in June 2015 [2015] EWHC 1634 (QB)). [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 1:00 am
Stocker v Stocker, heard 24 Jan 2019. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 3:44 am
A good example of this is Stocker v Stocker [2019] UKSC 17; [2018] EWCA Civ 170; [2016] EWHC 474 (QB) in which the meaning of five words “he tried to strangle me” went all the way on appeal to the Supreme Court. [read post]
27 May 2019, 1:00 am
Stocker v Stocker, heard 24 Jan 2019. [read post]
