Search for: "STRACHAN v. STRACHAN" Results 1 - 20 of 32
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 May 2009, 1:46 pm
On Thursday, April 30, 2009, after two days of deliberations, the jury in the trial of Bonfigli v. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 1:15 pm
"This court's [] February 23rd opinion is modified to add the word 'not' to the second sentence of the first full paragraph on page 15 to read: 'The jury, however, was erroneously instructed; hence, we cannot conclude that it would not have found fraud on the evidence before it or that the jury would not. . . .'  There is no change in the judgment. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 6:51 am by Mark S. Humphreys
The Texas Supreme Court, on June 11, 2010, issued an opinion in the case, State Farm Lloyds and Erin Strachan v. [read post]
26 May 2021, 4:00 am by Administrator
R v Beaver, 2020 ABCA 203 (CanLII) [13] A court must be satisfied of two things before excluding evidence under s.24(2): first, that the evidence was obtained in a manner that infringed or denied any of the rights or freedoms guaranteed by the Charter; and second, that admitting it would bring the administration of justice into disrepute (R v Wittwer, 2008 SCC 33 at para 19; R v Strachan, 1988 CanLII 25 (SCC), [1988] 2 SCR 980 at 1005-1006). [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 12:33 pm by emagraken
Langley (Township), Zanatta, Cassels, 2007 BCSC 993, at para. 198; Strachan v. [read post]