Search for: "STRONG v. CLARK et al"
Results 1 - 20
of 68
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Dec 2023, 6:04 am
The Strong Friends LLC et al. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm
”[3] “Because the regulation of crime is preeminently a matter for the States, we have identified ‘a strong judicial policy against federal interference with state criminal proceedings. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 12:18 pm
On May 19, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals issued its split opinion in Clark, et al. v. [read post]
A “Strong Likelihood” of Change: Sixth Circuit Joins the Fifth in Raising the FLSA Certification Bar
22 May 2023, 9:53 am
A&L Homecare and Training Center, et al. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 6:00 am
Decided and Entered:April 6, 2023 535386 In the Matter of the Arbitration between County of Albany, Respondent, and Civil Service Employees Association, Inc., Local 1000, AFSCME, AFL-CIO, Albany County Local 801, et al., Appellants. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 6:00 am
Decided and Entered:April 6, 2023 535386 In the Matter of the Arbitration between County of Albany, Respondent, and Civil Service Employees Association, Inc., Local 1000, AFSCME, AFL-CIO, Albany County Local 801, et al., Appellants. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 9:51 am
By Atreya Mathur “By far, the greatest danger of Artificial Intelligence is that people conclude too early that they understand it. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 6:06 am
That is evident in this observation: “The CAVV takes the view that not recognising functional immunity for international crimes is currently justifiable as either being consistent with international law or contributing to a legal development that already has strong momentum. [read post]
4 Dec 2022, 5:20 am
AL., FEDERAL PRACTICE & PROCEDURE: EVIDENCE §5501 (1st ed.) [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm
If Congress passes strong federal privacy legislation—as I hope it does—or if there is any other significant change in applicable law, then the Commission would be able to reassess the value-add of this effort and whether continuing it is a sound use of resources. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 5:43 am
The NAB v. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 5:30 am
Triumpho, Respondent, vCounty of Schoharie et al., Appellants. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 5:30 am
Triumpho, Respondent, vCounty of Schoharie et al., Appellants. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 3:21 pm
Clark D. [read post]
17 May 2021, 4:00 pm
EMW WOMEN'S SURGICAL CENTER, ET AL. [read post]
12 Mar 2021, 9:46 am
In this case, two new variants appeared within the global epidemic genotype, suggesting a strong pressure for evolution against the human immune system. [read post]
2 May 2020, 1:07 pm
Brott v. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 9:44 am
(v) Consent may be revoked or withdrawn any time before or during the act of sexual penetration, oral sex, or sexual contact. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 2:33 am
What is E. coli? [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 2:22 pm
A slew of Supreme Court researchers have written fascinating pieces about the justices’ case citations (Two of the many are from Fowler et al. (2007) and Cross et al. (2010).). [read post]
