Search for: "SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA v. CONSUMERS UNION OF U.S., INC." Results 1 - 20 of 28
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jun 2017, 4:45 am by Edith Roberts
’” Finally, in Amgen Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 2:56 pm by Eugene Volokh
Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc., 425 U.S. 748, 756 (1976).... [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 1:51 pm by Adam Feldman
The current Supreme Court is friendly toward big business. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 5:00 am by Beck, et al.
Levinson, 485 U.S. 224 (1988) (4 justice majority of 7-justice court).  [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 am by Ben
Well Marie-Andree cited that 1879 case  Feist Publications, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
The Supreme Court has expressly held that there is a First Amendment right of access to criminal trials, Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 12:00 pm by William B. Gould IV
Notwithstanding the Supreme Court’s pernicious holding in Janus that “fair share” agreements in the public sector are unconstitutional,(8) teachers have demonstrated and engaged in walkouts in numerous so called “red” states like West Virginia, Oklahoma, Arizona, and others similarly situated. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 9:06 am by Schachtman
The trial court dismissed the conspiracy count in Senart. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 9:12 pm by Badrinath Srinivasan
Finally, recent United States Supreme Court cases Rent-A-Center, West, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am by Ben
 Elsewhere, the Court of Justice of the European Union has defined, re-defined and refined its own and (perhaps) our understanding of what the right of 'communication to the public' under Article 3(1) of the InfoSoc Directive actually is. [read post]
31 Oct 2008, 4:56 pm
This evolution began when the Supreme Court refused to per se condemn a technical horizontal price fixing agreement that efficiently created a new product demanded by consumers.8 While per se cond [read post]