Search for: "Sackett v. United States Environmental Protection Agency" Results 1 - 20 of 61
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Mar 2012, 9:00 am by Jeff Lorenzo
United States Environmental Protection Agency (March 21, 2012) the Supremes held that the Clean Water Act is subject to the Administrative Procedure Act, which requires an appeals process for any ruling by a federal agency. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 2:32 pm by Sedina L. Banks
On March 21st, the United States Supreme Court unanimously ruled that the Sackett family has a right to challenge a pre-enforcement compliance order from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)before EPA initiates a formal enforcement action in Sackett v. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 6:25 am
United States Environmental Protection Agency, No. 10-1062. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 6:25 am
United States Environmental Protection Agency, No. 10-1062. [read post]
25 Aug 2021, 2:07 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Environmental Protection Agency, alleging the deposit of fill onto their property constituted an unlawful discharge of pollutants into the waters of the United States under the Clean Water Act (CWA). [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 10:42 am by Rosa Schechter
" To read the entirety of the March 2012 opinion of the United States Supreme Court in Sackett v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 9:52 am by Rosa Schechter
" To read the entirety of the March 2012 opinion of the United States Supreme Court in Sackett v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 12:33 pm by Bill Ward
U.S.Environmental Protection Agency Supreme Court of the United States No. 10–1062. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 4:04 pm by James Ramey
” http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/sackett-et-vir-v-environmental-protection-agency-et-al/ [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 2:11 pm
EPA, unanimously rejecting the United States Environmental Protection Agency's prohibition against judicial review of administrative compliance orders issued under the Clean Water Act, may be hailed as one of the most significant environmental rulings in recent memory. [read post]
24 Mar 2012, 9:30 pm by William Funk
 After learning of this plan and subsequent discussions with the Sacketts, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) concluded that the land was wetlands subject to protection under the Clean Water Act (CWA) and issued a Compliance Order to the Sacketts. [read post]