Search for: "Sackett v. United States Environmental Protection Agency" Results 41 - 60 of 133
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Sep 2023, 3:30 pm by lennyesq
The EPA and Department of the Army announced a final rule amending the definition of protected “waters of the United States” in light of the decision in Sackett v. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 8:29 am by Paul R. Recupero
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), which instructed the Sacketts to stop work because of the presence of wetlands protected by the CWA, which bars the discharge of pollutants, including rocks and sand, into “waters of the United States. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 8:29 am by Paul R. Recupero
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), which instructed the Sacketts to stop work because of the presence of wetlands protected by the CWA, which bars the discharge of pollutants, including rocks and sand, into “waters of the United States. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 8:29 am by Paul R. Recupero
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), which instructed the Sacketts to stop work because of the presence of wetlands protected by the CWA, which bars the discharge of pollutants, including rocks and sand, into “waters of the United States. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 2:11 pm
EPA, unanimously rejecting the United States Environmental Protection Agency's prohibition against judicial review of administrative compliance orders issued under the Clean Water Act, may be hailed as one of the most significant environmental rulings in recent memory. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 10:18 am by James J. Scherer
Environmental Protection Agency II The Sacketts continued their fight against the EPA in Sackett v. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 8:25 pm by Sri Medicherla
Environmental Protection Agency announced a final rule that revised the definition of “waters of the United States,” limiting the agency’s authority to address water pollution. [read post]
24 Mar 2012, 9:30 pm by William Funk
 After learning of this plan and subsequent discussions with the Sacketts, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) concluded that the land was wetlands subject to protection under the Clean Water Act (CWA) and issued a Compliance Order to the Sacketts. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 3:02 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Environmental Protection Agency, a case in which the Court is asked (once again) to clarify the scope of federal regulatory authority over wetlands under the Clean Water Act (CWA). [read post]
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) argues that the court should uphold the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit’s significant-nexus test. [read post]
25 May 2023, 8:40 am by Amy Howe
The ruling was a setback for the Environmental Protection Agency and a victory for an Idaho couple, Michael and Chantell Sackett, who have been battling with the federal government for over 15 years in their efforts to build a house on an empty lot near a large lake. [read post]