Search for: "Sackett v. United States Environmental Protection Agency"
Results 61 - 80
of 125
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jan 2012, 6:29 am
In Sackett v. [read post]
26 May 2023, 10:54 am
Under the Clean Water Act, these agencies have dual regulatory authority to protect “waters of the United States” and “adjacent wetlands. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 10:48 am
In Sackett v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 9:35 am
Sackett v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 5:56 am
United States Environmental Protection Agency, 566 U.S. ___, No. 10-1062 (Mar. 12, 2012). [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 6:15 am
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the U.S. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 6:15 am
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the U.S. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 6:15 am
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the U.S. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 7:00 am
Today in our discussion of Sackett v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 7:14 pm
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)—the two agencies tasked with implementing the CWA—issued a final rule redefining WOTUS. [read post]
25 May 2023, 9:03 pm
The Environmental Protection Agency informed the Sacketts that their property contained wetlands and that their backfilling violated the Clean Water Act, which prohibits discharging pollutants into “the waters of the United States. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 12:00 pm
One of those cases, Sackett v. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 9:00 pm
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and U.S. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 2:08 pm
Environmental Protection Agency, 566 U.S. [read post]
30 Jan 2022, 9:05 pm
United States, another case litigated by Pacific Legal Foundation. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 6:30 am
Today in our discussion of Sackett v. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 2:00 am
The case is United States v. [read post]
25 Sep 2022, 9:04 pm
Environmental Protection Agency, administrative law experts again asked the perennial question: Is Chevron deference dead? [read post]
21 Nov 2021, 7:43 pm
Last week, the Environmental Protection Agency and U.S. [read post]
