Search for: "Sackett v. United States Environmental Protection Agency" Results 81 - 100 of 131
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Oct 2021, 9:43 am by Andrew Hamm
Environmental Protection Agency 21-454Issue: Whether Rapanos v. [read post]
31 Aug 2021, 4:09 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Environmental Protection Agency is merely the latest judicial decision in a decades-long fight over the scope of CWA regulatory jurisdiction. [read post]
25 Aug 2021, 2:07 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Environmental Protection Agency, alleging the deposit of fill onto their property constituted an unlawful discharge of pollutants into the waters of the United States under the Clean Water Act (CWA). [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 9:59 am by John Elwood
Environmental Protection Agency was for the EPA. [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 11:38 am by Aaron Nielson
Environmental Protection Agency, biofuel manufacturers challenged the EPA’s refusal to allow a biofuel to be used as a test fuel. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 11:34 am by Andrew Hamm
Environmental Protection Agency. [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 10:53 am by Miriam Seifter
The question presented in United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 10:45 am by John Elwood
A few Terms ago, in Sackett v. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 1:34 pm by Anthony B. Cavender
The Court confronted a similar challenge a few years ago when it delivered an opinion in the case of Sackett v. [read post]
1 Mar 2015, 9:01 pm by Ronald D. Rotunda
Environmental Protection Agency (2012), another property case. [read post]
26 Dec 2012, 9:30 pm by RegBlog
 After learning of this plan and subsequent discussions with the Sacketts, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) concluded that the land was wetlands subject to protection under the Clean Water Act (CWA) and issued a Compliance Order to the Sacketts. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 4:04 pm by James Ramey
” [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 8:03 am by Kedar
Environmental Protection Agency Kappos v. [read post]