Search for: "Safer v. Superior Court"
Results 1 - 20
of 108
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jun 2021, 12:20 am
Case preview: Rakusen v Jepson – Rent Repayment Orders (RROs) and superior landlords in the Court of Appeal Next month the Court of Appeal will hear an appeal from a landlord in a rent repayment order case, Rakusen v Jepson. [read post]
8 Sep 2021, 7:17 am
Rakusen v. [read post]
16 Jun 2021, 12:20 am
Case preview: Rakusen v Jepson – Rent Repayment Orders (RROs) and superior landlords in the Court of Appeal Next month the Court of Appeal will hear an appeal from a landlord in a rent repayment order case, Rakusen v Jepson. [read post]
8 Sep 2021, 7:17 am
Rakusen v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 7:21 am
According to court records, Reynold Regis filed an appeal (STATE v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 9:25 am
The case was Soederberg v. [read post]
29 Jul 2021, 6:01 am
Rakusen v Jepson & Ors, Safer Renting Intervenor (2021) EWCA Civ 1150 This is the Court of Appeal judgment on an appeal from the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) appeal (our report here). [read post]
6 Nov 2008, 4:59 pm
All of the elements identified by the Court in Cordero v. [read post]
5 Mar 2023, 9:33 am
Rakusen v Jepsen & Ors (2023) UKSC 9 The issue for the Supreme Court was whether the wording of section 40 and 41 Housing and Planning Act 2016 meant that a rent repayment order could be made against only a tenant’s immediate landlord, or also against a superior landlord (where the occupying tenant’s landlord themselves had a tenancy of the property) where that landlord had also committed a relevant offence. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 2:05 pm
Bukowski v. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 2:13 pm
Bukowski v. [read post]
17 Jun 2017, 8:30 pm
Intervenor Huckleberry Propane & Oil, LLC, appealed an order of the Superior Court reversing a decision of the planning board for the defendant, the Town of Wilmot, to grant Huckleberry’s site plan application. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 1:00 pm
A majority in Schmidt v. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 8:13 am
Biolase, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Oct 2011, 8:23 am
" Cole v. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 1:04 pm
(Colgan v. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 7:26 pm
” The case cite is King Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 6:30 am
In Pusl, a three-judge panel of the Superior Court allowed the molding of a third-party verdict downward to reflect the previous UIM settlement secured by a plaintiff for the same accident and thereby prevent a double recovery.After Pusl, the plaintiffs bar switched back to the strategy pursuing the third-party liability claims first for several years until the 2012 decision of the Superior Court came down in Smith v. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 8:14 am
Superior Court, Appellate Division). [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 8:14 am
Superior Court, Appellate Division). [read post]
