Search for: "Sage v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 307
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Apr 2024, 4:35 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
I’m pleased to write about the two cases again at the finale of their ten-year-long merits litigation odysseys (except in the unlikely event one or more losing defendant obtains leave to reargue or leave to appeal to the New York State Court of Appeals). [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 5:00 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Moreover, there are no allegations related to breaching a promise to acehive a specific result, but only allegations about breaches of vague and non-specific (and somewhat boilerplate) provisions of the retainer agreement (see Mamoon v Dot Net Inc., 135 AD3d 656 [1st Dept 2016] citing Sage Realty Corp. v Proskauer Rose, 251 AD2d 3 5, 3 9 [1st Dept 1998] [ dismissing breach of contract claim as duplicative of legal malpractice claim where there were no allegations about a… [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 8:41 am by Eugene Volokh
The University of Chicago law school website shows 62 "full time reaching faculty" v. 127 "Lecturers in Law" (another—and, to some ears, a more dignified—term for adjuncts). [read post]
18 May 2023, 7:17 am by Giles Peaker
There has been a lot of fuss about this, but as Tessa Shepperson has sagely observed, it doesn’t really make much of a change to existing law. [read post]
1 May 2023, 8:55 pm by Stephen Halbrook
" Judge McGlynn offered the following sage reflections: "Nothing in this order prevents the State from confronting firearm-related violence. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Ten years later, the 118th Congress includes five Indian Americans; nearly 50 are in state Legislatures. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 5:59 am by Kevin LaCroix
For example, on August 5, 2022, the FTC issued final approval to a Consent Agreement regarding the acquisition of SAGE Veterinary Partners LLC (“SAGE”) by private equity fund JAB Consumer Partners SCA SICAR (“JAB”). [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 4:35 am by Peter Mahler
Sage Systems, Inc. v Liss Rare is the agreement among co-owners of business entities lacking a provision for indemnification of officers, directors, managers, etc. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
” (This latter point becomes the focus of my later essay on A Mantra in Search of Meaning, also published as part of a symposium, this one at the University of North Carolina Law School celebrating the 40th anniversary of Baker v. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 4:53 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
In Sage, the Court of Appeals overturned a line of case law starting with Crossroads ABL LLC v Canaras Capital Mgt., LLC (105 AD3d 645 [1st Dept 2013]). [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 4:47 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
The Court of Appeals alluded to this drafting solution in Sage, writing at the end of its opinion that “inclusion of clear language stating that the prevailing party is entitled to recover attorneys’ fees in an action between the parties would avoid potential litigation on the issue. [read post]