Search for: "Sage v. State" Results 201 - 220 of 310
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Mar 2013, 7:38 am by Ronald Collins
Hockett, A Storm over This Court: Law, Politics, and Supreme Court Decision Making in Brown v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 9:02 am by Deborah Pearlstein
The Supreme Court’s decision yesterday in Ziglar v. [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 2:28 am by Ben
   This could be an interesting case - and reminds the CopyKat of the recent decision by Mr Justice Birss in Temple Island Collections Ltd v New English Teas Ltd & another [2012] EWPCC 1 where infringement was found, and the decision by a Korean appellate court that found that the 'recreation' of a photograph of a natural scene of pine trees on an island set against a skyline could not be infringement - although neither of those cases took 28 years to… [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 5:46 pm
Boredom: The Literary History of a State of Mind. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
” Liz’s subject is the non-profit philanthropic foundation, which in the early 20th century was rendered a “new species” of corporation by Russell Sage and Carnegie, among others. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 9:16 am by Joe Consumer
 And hundreds of state laws, as well. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 3:04 pm by David Hansen, JD
That case was initially brought in 2008 against GSU by Cambridge University Press,  Oxford University Press and Sage. [read post]
22 Nov 2008, 5:27 pm
 In Spirit of the Sage Council, et al. v. [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 4:29 am by Edith Roberts
” Briefly: At Justia’s Verdict blog, Sherry Colb discusses the court’s decision in Moore v. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 3:04 pm by David Hansen, JD
That case was initially brought in 2008 against GSU by Cambridge University Press,  Oxford University Press and Sage. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 3:04 pm by David Hansen, JD
That case was initially brought in 2008 against GSU by Cambridge University Press,  Oxford University Press and Sage. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 11:32 pm by Charon QC
In Bowman v Secular Society Limited [1917] AC 406 at 457, Lord Sumner refers to the older Taylor’s case of 1676 1 Vent, as follows: ‘…and Hale said that such kind of wicked blasphemous words were not only an offence to God and religion, but a crime against the Laws, State, and Government, and therefore punishable in this Court. [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 12:02 pm by Kevin Smith, J.D.
 The petition relies on the 1980′s decision in Harper and Row v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 9:43 pm
Lucasfilms v Ainsworth [2009] EWCA Civ 1328, and on appeal to the Supreme Court). [read post]
17 Dec 2017, 3:28 pm by Wolfgang Demino
It purports to offer sage advice to financial industry peers on how to improve their game so as to make sure that other Circuits don’t catch the Madden infection. [read post]