Search for: "Sage v. State" Results 161 - 180 of 310
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Oct 2013, 6:26 pm by Law Lady
Contracts -- Torts -- Jurisdiction -- Non-residents -- Law firm's action against former client for breach of contract and against former client's attorney for tortious interference with contract -- Allegations that out-of-state client breached contract with Florida attorneys by failing to make payment in state were sufficient to bring former client within ambit of long-arm statute -- Former client had sufficient minimum contacts with Florida where she voluntarily contracted with… [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 4:37 pm by Ron Coleman
New York State Supreme Court, 60 Centre Street We can sit by the fire. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 4:00 am by Devlin Hartline
Most, if not all, states have theft laws that substantially track the Model Penal Code. [read post]
4 Aug 2013, 6:43 am by Howard Friedman
He sought their return, their exclusion as evidence in his upcoming state criminal trial, dismissal of criminal charges against him and millions of dollars in damages.In Doe v. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 7:50 am by John Elwood
United States, 12-8505, for that upstart non-relist Paroline v. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 8:29 am by Emily Lonergan
I contemplated a post about the recent United States Supreme Court decision in Missouri v. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 6:37 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
[v] South Dakota: American indigenous peoples comprise 27 percent of the South Dakota prison population, the highest proportion of any state in the country. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 7:38 am by Ronald Collins
Hockett, A Storm over This Court: Law, Politics, and Supreme Court Decision Making in Brown v. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 6:45 am by Kevin Smith, J.D.
Another day, another silly brief filed in support of the plaintiff publishers in the Georgia State copyright infringement appeal. [read post]
12 Oct 2012, 4:48 pm by Garry Fujita
State of Washington (BTA docket no. 11-704), the Washington's Board of Tax Appeals (BTA) thoughtfully considered Sage V's commerce clause arguments and agreed with Sage V. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 11:32 pm by Charon QC
In Bowman v Secular Society Limited [1917] AC 406 at 457, Lord Sumner refers to the older Taylor’s case of 1676 1 Vent, as follows: ‘…and Hale said that such kind of wicked blasphemous words were not only an offence to God and religion, but a crime against the Laws, State, and Government, and therefore punishable in this Court. [read post]