Search for: "Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Corp." Results 1 - 20 of 122
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jan 2022, 3:30 am by Eric B. Meyer
Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Corp., the plaintiff alleged that his employer retaliated against him for complaining about wage and hour practices. [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 12:08 pm by admin
Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Corp., 431 F. [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 12:08 pm by Schachtman
Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Corp., 431 F. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 6:41 am by Joy Waltemath
Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Corp., the Supreme Court directed that a complaint “must be sufficiently clear and detailed for a reasonable employer to understand it, in light of both content and context, as an assertion of rights protected by the statute and a call for their protection. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 2:53 pm by Walsh & Walsh, P.C.
Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Corp. (2011) 563 U.S. 1, the complaint was “sufficiently clear and detailed for a reasonable employer to understand it, in light of both content and context, as an assertion of rights protected by the statute and a call for their protection. [read post]
21 May 2015, 10:26 am by Kevin Smith and Ryan Duffy
Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Corp., 131 S.Ct. 1325 (2011), which held that oral complaints were adequate, so long as the complaint is “sufficiently clear and detailed for a reasonable employer to understand it, in light of both content and context, as an assertion of rights protected by the statute and a call for their protection. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 4:59 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Corp., that oral complaints of a violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act can constitute protected activity under the FLSA’s anti-retaliation provision. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 6:45 am by Joy Waltemath
Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Corp., the Second Circuit concluded that not only does an oral complaint suffice, as the High Court held in Kasten, but also an oral complaint made to the employer, rather than only to a government entity, would be enough. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 7:21 am by Joy Waltemath
Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Corp., which held that oral complaints are covered under the FLSA’s anti-retaliation provision, the High Court expressly declined to resolve the separate question of whether “complaints made directly to an employer” (be they oral or written) fall within the statute’s scope—or if instead the statute protects only “formal complaints made to an administrative or governmental authority. [read post]
13 May 2014, 6:38 am by Joy Waltemath
From the majority’s perspective the Supreme Court’s ruling in Kasten v Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Corp. did not change things. [read post]
10 Jan 2014, 7:04 am by Joy Waltemath
While the Seventh Circuit has not addressed the exact parameters of what constitutes a “complaint,” the Supreme Court stated in Kasten v Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Corp, that a complaint must give the employer fair notice that a grievance has been lodged against it. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 5:55 am by laborprof lpb
Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Corp.: Putting Policy Over Plain Language? [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 7:18 am by Theo Lu
Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Corp., the Supreme Court held that an employee’s oral complaint of a wage and hour violation was afforded the same protection as a written complaint. [read post]