Search for: "Salas v. State" Results 81 - 100 of 141
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 May 2007, 9:54 am
14 (ii) Except as otherwise provided by law, on the first day of April in 15 each year commencing on or after two thousand eight, if the annual sala- 16 ry of a judge of the United States district court was increased within 17 the preceding twelve months, the annual salary of a justice of the EXPLANATION--Matter in italics (underscored) is new; matter in brackets [ ] is old law to be omitted. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 10:59 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Citizens for Environmental Responsibility v State ex rel. 14th Dist. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 7:23 am by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.
Lagos, 388 Md. 718, 721 (2005), a Maryland Court of Appeals opinion that addressed the eligibility of an illegal alien to receive workers’ compensation benefits Salas v. [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 1:01 am
The Court stated that Romero v. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 12:01 pm
Our guest blogger, Sean Costello of Jones Day, opined that Judge Easterbrook of the Seventh Circuit solved this riddle in Spivey v. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 6:42 am by Joy Waltemath
Supreme Court’s definitive interpretation of federal policy as set forth in IRCA (Salas v Sierra Chemical Co, June 26, 2014, Kennard, J). [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 5:19 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
While a tie goes to runner in baseball, close calls go to the individual defendants in Section 1983 cases.The case is Cornejo v. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 2:23 pm by Moderator
  However, some case law provides that mandates are automatically extended if their duration ends without a resignation by the attorney-in-fact or substitution by another one (Decision of August 18, 1991, quoted in Dulio Arroyo, 20 Años de Jurisprudencia de la Sala Civil, Panamá, 1982, p. 300).Article 1010 states that obligations which have a definitive date set for their performance, will only be demanded when said date arrives. [read post]
12 Apr 2014, 6:55 am by Yishai Schwartz
Paul also flagged US District Judge Esther Salas’ decision in the “most important cybersecurity case you’ve never heard of,” Wyndham v. [read post]