Search for: "Salas v. State"
Results 121 - 137
of 137
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jan 2009, 8:00 am
See La Sala v. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 7:05 am
The police report listed the other driver as Jose Manuel Salas Oleda of 207 Vance Street, Wilson, North Carolina 27093 (maybe he lived above the beauty salon? [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 12:01 pm
Our guest blogger, Sean Costello of Jones Day, opined that Judge Easterbrook of the Seventh Circuit solved this riddle in Spivey v. [read post]
5 Jun 2008, 6:20 am
"); cf La Sala v. [read post]
24 Apr 2008, 2:02 am
Sala v. [read post]
2 Jan 2008, 6:28 am
Garcia-Salas, No. 07-2126 (10th Cir. [read post]
26 Sep 2007, 4:05 am
United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 6:25 am
Salas (AT)For a copy of the Appellate Division's decision, please use this link: 855-79 LLC v Salas (AD) [read post]
2 May 2007, 9:54 am
14 (ii) Except as otherwise provided by law, on the first day of April in
15 each year commencing on or after two thousand eight, if the annual sala-
16 ry of a judge of the United States district court was increased within
17 the preceding twelve months, the annual salary of a justice of the
EXPLANATION--Matter in italics (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
[ ] is old law to be omitted. [read post]
2 May 2007, 2:06 am
Annual salaries of state-paid judges and justices of the 5 unified court system. [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 1:01 am
The Court stated that Romero v. [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 10:02 pm
See 29-2262.01 State v. [read post]
20 Feb 2007, 8:00 pm
" The employees, however, relied upon La Sala v. [read post]
19 Feb 2007, 4:51 am
The Court of Appeal disagreed, holding that La Sala v. [read post]
29 Jan 2007, 11:38 am
La Sala v. [read post]
9 Aug 2006, 8:22 am
Aunque con esa limitación, "Sánchez" -con Boggiano como único disidente- es la matriz que fraguó por sus fundamentos el fallo unánime de la vÃspera.Eppur si muove: el fallo "Badaro"A partir de 2002, los jubilados sà tuvieron varios aumentos, pero casi todos ellos fueron dados como "sumas fijas" y asignados a los que tenÃan los haberes mÃnimos. [read post]
14 Dec 2005, 3:40 pm
United States", 383 U.S. 541, 1966)".Hay otras cosas interesantes que dice la Corte sobre derecho penal, en las que trasciende el tema puntual de la punición a menores.El concepto de peligrosidad: "no corresponde a la competencia de esta Corte interpretar el alcance especÃfico de la expresión "peligrosidad" contenida en el art. 41 del Código Penal. [read post]
