Search for: "Salas v. State" Results 121 - 140 of 143
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jul 2009, 10:03 pm
Interpreting Rule 34 and the Sedona principles, Aguilar v. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 4:04 am
Appointing authority not required to give its former employee a reason for denying his or her application for reinstatementSalas v New York City Police Dept., 2009 NY Slip Op 04705, Decided on June 9, 2009, Appellate Division, First DepartmentEddie Salas a New York City police officer, resigned from his position on the eve of a departmental hearing scheduled to address allegations that he refused to obey a superior's order to arrest a sleeping homeless person. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 8:27 am
Here is a Hutch News article reporting that Phillip White (my old public defender colleague) won an acquittal in State v. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 1:52 am
Abel Salas, No. 99,830 (Sedgwick)Appeal from denial of DNA test (transfer)Casey J. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 7:05 am
The police report listed the other driver as Jose Manuel Salas Oleda of 207 Vance Street, Wilson, North Carolina 27093 (maybe he lived above the beauty salon? [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 12:01 pm
Our guest blogger, Sean Costello of Jones Day, opined that Judge Easterbrook of the Seventh Circuit solved this riddle in Spivey v. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 1:08 am
Salas NASSAU COUNTYCivil PracticeAttorney Lacks Standing Under State Finance Law §123-b to Challenge Government Decision Liotti v. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 6:25 am
Salas (AT)For a copy of the Appellate Division's decision, please use this link: 855-79 LLC v Salas (AD) [read post]
2 May 2007, 9:54 am
14 (ii) Except as otherwise provided by law, on the first day of April in 15 each year commencing on or after two thousand eight, if the annual sala- 16 ry of a judge of the United States district court was increased within 17 the preceding twelve months, the annual salary of a justice of the EXPLANATION--Matter in italics (underscored) is new; matter in brackets [ ] is old law to be omitted. [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 1:01 am
The Court stated that Romero v. [read post]