Search for: "Salazar v. State" Results 41 - 60 of 488
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jul 2019, 10:33 am by Erwin Chemerinsky
Gorsuch echoed a position taken earlier in 2010 by Scalia in Salazar v. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 10:36 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here is the abstract: Ten years ago, the United States Supreme Court issued its watershed decision in Carcieri v. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 5:40 am by Joel R. Brandes
See Salazar, 750 F.3d at 520 (stating that “the prevailing petitioner is presumptively entitled to necessary costs”) The Court noted that the term “clearly inappropriate” is not used in any other fee-shifting statute. [read post]
16 Sep 2018, 6:03 am by Joel R. Brandes
See Salazar, 750 F.3d at 520 (stating that “the prevailing petitioner is presumptively entitled to necessary costs”) The Court noted that the term “clearly inappropriate” is not used in any other fee-shifting statute. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 3:39 pm by David Kopel
" The Washington Post reports that a state sponsor of terrorism is already attempting to obtain these guns. [read post]
8 Apr 2018, 8:26 pm
Mark Lawrence and his Diocese of South Carolina before the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
8 Apr 2018, 2:09 pm
Mark Lawrence and his Diocese of South Carolina before the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 5:15 pm by Ronald Mann
His suit challenging the secretary’s decision has already been up to the Supreme Court once – leading to a remarkable 2012 ruling in Salazar v. [read post]
26 Oct 2017, 5:47 am by bryannewland
The House Natural Resources Committee cited this theory in a memorandum it published in 2015: In Carcieri v. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 12:50 pm by Dan Ernst
As many LHB readers are aware, the Law and Society Association hosts "Collaborative Research Networks" that sponsors panels for its annual meeting. [read post]
26 May 2017, 10:15 am by Peter Margulies
Consider Congress’s exaltation of crosses in Salazar v. [read post]