Search for: "Salazar v. State" Results 81 - 100 of 492
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Feb 2017, 12:04 pm by John Elwood
(relisted after the February 17 conference)    Salazar-Limon v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 6:58 am by Joy Waltemath
The court also granted the fast food giant’s motion to strike the plaintiffs’ representative claims under the California Labor Code Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) (Salazar v. [read post]
19 Aug 2016, 7:46 am by Joy Waltemath
If they could establish an “ostensible agency” relationship—which would require showing, among other things, a reasonable belief McDonalds was their employer—McDonalds could be held jointly liable for the franchisee’s alleged violations of California wage laws (Salazar v. [read post]
11 May 2016, 9:19 am by Frankl & Kominsky, P.A.
Related Posts: Florida’s Second District Court of Appeal Affirms Denial of Discovery in Medical Negligence Case Florida Fourth District Rules Noneconomic Damages Caps Unconstitutional in Medical Negligence Case Salazar v. [read post]
11 May 2016, 9:19 am by Frankl & Kominsky, P.A.
Related Posts: Florida’s Second District Court of Appeal Affirms Denial of Discovery in Medical Negligence Case Florida Fourth District Rules Noneconomic Damages Caps Unconstitutional in Medical Negligence Case Salazar v. [read post]
11 May 2016, 9:19 am by Frankl & Kominsky, P.A.
Related Posts: Florida’s Second District Court of Appeal Affirms Denial of Discovery in Medical Negligence Case Florida Fourth District Rules Noneconomic Damages Caps Unconstitutional in Medical Negligence Case Salazar v. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 5:33 am
Dodd, 598 F.3d 449, 452–53 (U.S.Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit 2010)); see also United States v. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 4:11 pm by Howard Friedman
Summary dismissal of a suit charging discrimination based on sex and religion for failure to state a claim.Village of Bensenville v. [read post]
29 Dec 2015, 7:23 am by Lorene Park
Given the apparent overreaction in immediately firing the employee, the court found a triable question on whether this was pretext for age discrimination (Salazar v. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 1:34 pm
  In the declaratory judgment action, the trial court held that the funding transactions created “debt,” and were thus “loans” governed by the UCCC, under the Code’s plain language, the court’s historical definition of debt, and the court’s decision in State ex rel Salazar v. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 6:06 am by Joy Waltemath
The district court had misconstrued the summary judgment burden born by the worker, who only needed to present evidence that demonstrated the falsity of his employer’s explanation, declared the appeals court in an unpublished decision (Salazar v. [read post]