Search for: "Sales v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 16,663
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jul 2020, 6:14 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
On April 3, 2013, the buyer’s attorney sent Goodman a letter stating that the title insurance company had waived its objections to title, and rescheduled the closing for April 22, 2013, with time being of the essence. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 4:00 am by Canadian Forum on Civil Justice
Because we recognize that this is a fair way of proceeding in the context of a serious power-imbalance between the state’s ability to prosecute and the accused’s ability to defend themselves against the power and resources of the state. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 2:55 pm by Kit Walsh
Mexico has just adopted a terrible new copyright law, thanks to pressure from the United States (and specifically from the copyright maximalists that hold outsized influence on US foreign policy). [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 1:32 pm by Nedim Malovic
In the case at hand, Hugo Boss was able to demonstrate – by means of sales figures, marketing expenditure, and independent sources such as various surveys, studies and sponsorships – that its mark enjoys a high degree of recognition amongst the relevant public in Germany and in the EU for certain goods in Class 25. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 1:59 pm by Kevin LaCroix
State laws, Japan’s Company Act provides shareholders opposing the reorganization the right to request the company to purchase shares at a “fair price”, and if the negotiation cannot be concluded within a certain period of time, the opposing shareholders can request the court to determine the fair price. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 5:00 am by Josh Blackman
This case held that 42 U.S.C. 1982 prohibits racial discrimination in the sale of real estate. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 4:22 am by Verónica Rodríguez Arguijo
 In this connection, he briefly discussed the case, 3M company v KM Brothers, involving the sale of N95 masks on Amazon at costs exceeding 3M’s list prices. [read post]
Matson’s complaint alleged that the terms of sale were unconscionable, and they relied on a mistake of fact when purchasing the deed of trust. [read post]
The CJEU then stated that it is for the Belgian Court to verify this, bearing in mind all aspects of the main dispute. [read post]