Search for: "Salinger v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 26
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Aug 2009, 7:11 am
  The United States does not recognize these rights, with one very limited exception, and restricts the copyright incentive to economic rewards. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 6:59 am by Eric Osterberg
United States case went on to give the following useful summary of the state of the presumption of irreparable harm law in IP cases. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 11:59 pm by Eric Osterberg
United States case went on to give the following useful summary of the state of the presumption of irreparable harm law in IP cases. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 6:59 am by Eric Osterberg
United States case went on to give the following useful summary of the state of the presumption of irreparable harm law in IP cases. [read post]
13 Nov 2016, 6:13 am by Brooke
Meigs, Lincoln’s General, Master Builder of the Union Army is also reviewed in the newspaper.Nicholas Syrett's American Child Bride: A History of Minors and Marriage in the United States is reviewed at Slate. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 1:26 pm by Naomi Jane Gray
 The United States Supreme Court’s 2014 opinion in a patent case, Octane Fitness, LLC v. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 1:26 pm by Naomi Jane Gray
 The United States Supreme Court’s 2014 opinion in a patent case, Octane Fitness, LLC v. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 8:31 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
(internal quotation marks and citations omitted)); Salinger v. [read post]
5 Jul 2009, 2:23 pm
The trend continued last week with the highest ever award of damages in a patent case in the United States. [read post]
9 Aug 2009, 1:21 pm
The court's statement in Religious Technology Center v Lerma (1995) was also cited in argument of the danger of granting prior restraints in copyright cases such as this as being unconstitutional:"If a threat to national security was insufficient to warrant a prior restraint in New York Times Co. v United States, the threat to plaintiff's copyrights and trade secrets is woefully inadequate. [read post]
30 Jan 2011, 8:17 am
(Picture, top left - the AmeriKat hiding in her shopping bag after a long afternoon browsing)RIAA lawyer to be next US Solicitor GeneralAnother change was announced last week when President Obama (right) nominated Donald Verrilli as the next United States Solicitor General. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am by Terry Hart
As support, it then stated, “In Fox Film Corp. v. [read post]
17 Mar 2019, 5:35 pm by INFORRM
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am by Terry Hart
The Supreme Court rejected this argument, saying, “the mere fact that a copyright is property derived from a grant by the United States is insufficient to support the claim of exemption.” To be exempt from state taxation, the government must reserve some sort of controlling interest in a grant or privilege. [read post]