Search for: "Sample v. State"
Results 101 - 120
of 4,161
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Apr 2024, 12:16 am
Concerning the correspondence between the colour sample and the description, the Court referred to Red Bull v EUIPO (case C-124/18 P, IPKat here), in which the CJEU found that the description must serve to clarify the subject matter and scope of protection sought. [read post]
31 Mar 2024, 9:48 am
For example, in People v. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 4:46 pm
Amgen Inc. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 10:56 am
” The devices were imported into the United States when a Meril employee came to San Francisco to attend the 2019 Transcatheter Cardiovascular Therapeutics Conference (“TCTC”), bringing the samples along as “demonstration” samples. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 5:01 am
See James v. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 6:00 am
United States, 306 F.2d 633, 637 (2d Cir. 1962) ; United States v. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 6:56 am
Using this sample, they approached a factory in Portugal and requested adjustments to infuse elements reminiscent of Celine, providing a vague image of the brand’s Luggage bag for reference. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 4:07 pm
Cloud, where they complete intake and are eventually transported to their assigned facility in the State. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 7:20 am
The 2018 American Heritage Time Use Study sampled work experiences for six separate years running from 1965 to 1998. [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 9:05 pm
The agency explained that the ruling in Dobbs v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 1:11 am
The fact that Sir Mark had been buried at Sledmere in a sealed lead coffin raised the likelihood of better samples being found for the petitioner’s research. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 10:50 am
Co. v. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 3:48 pm
In KPMG, LLC v. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 6:41 am
Only one case, Sample v. [read post]
25 Feb 2024, 11:23 am
New Article: Natasha V. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 10:19 am
Valiente v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 6:10 pm
By Véronique Li, Senior Medical Device Regulation Expert & Ana Loloei & Allyson B. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 5:51 pm
In 1995 the Court identified state interests that might justify the rules. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 5:51 pm
In 1995 the Court identified state interests that might justify the rules. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 7:46 am
See James v. [read post]