Search for: "Sampson v. State Bar" Results 1 - 20 of 25
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Mar 2018, 5:35 am by Alyson Drake
She was the president pro tem of the Senate for a period and also served a single day as acting state governor. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
This ran counter to the principles in Scott v Sampson (1882) 8 QBD 491 (which states that it is not legitimate to plead or prove in mitigation of damages specific acts of misconduct, even if they concern the same “sector” of the claimant’s life, which in this case was far from certain) and Plato Films Ltd v Speidel [1961] AC 1090 (pursuant to which it is not legitimate to rely in mitigation of damages on the fact that the publication complained… [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 4:42 pm by INFORRM
There remains to be seen whether this evidential hurdle may revive the debate over the rule in Scott v Sampson (1882) 8 QBD 491 as to whether a defendant should be permitted to put in evidence (inadmissible as the law now stands) of other defamatory allegations, whether published or not, in an effort to show that the publication complained of would not be likely to cause any substantial additional harm. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 7:51 am
Summary of Decision issued April 21, 2009Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme Court.Case Name: Williams v. [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 4:10 am
S 59 Last Act: 01/07/09 referred to ways and meansA160 Budget -- Enacts into law major components of legislation which are necessary to implement the state fiscal plan for the 2009-2010 state fiscal year Same as Uni. [read post]
12 Feb 2023, 5:03 pm by INFORRM
United States Texas State Representative, Giovanni Capriglione, introduced a privacy bill to the state legislature which closely follows the Virginia Consumer Data Protection Act. [read post]
11 Sep 2010, 7:39 am by lawmrh
For example, a 4 state study by Kevin Esterling and Kathleen Sampson, revealed that in Arizona and Utah, respectively, only some 30% and 50% of the voters reported any awareness of judicial evaluation reports.[4] Conclusions. [read post]