Search for: "Samsung Electronics America, Inc"
Results 81 - 100
of 258
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jul 2012, 4:05 pm
Patent No. 5,809,336 (the ‘336 patent): Acer Inc. of Taiwan Acer America Corporation of San Jose, California Amazon.com, Inc. of Seattle, Washington Barnes & Noble, Inc. of New York, New York Garmin Ltd. of Switzerland Garmin International, Inc. of Olathe, Kansas Garmin USA, Inc. of Olathe, Kansas HTC Corporation of Taiwan HTC America of Bellevue, Washington Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. of China Huawei North America… [read post]
21 Sep 2018, 4:47 am
Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., No. 18-189 (Three good questions): Whether Administrative Patent Judges of the [PTAB] are principal Officers of the United States who must be appointed by the President with the advice and consent of the Senate under the Appointments Clause. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 4:41 pm
., Ltd of Japan and Murata Electronics North America, Inc. of Smyrna, Georgia (collectively, "Murata") filed a complaint requesting that the ITC commence an investigation pursuant to Section 337. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 6:59 am
" Petition for Covered Business Method Patent Review by Samsung Electronics America, Inc., CBM2014-00190 (PTAB May 26, 2016, Order) (Elluru, APJ) [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 6:56 am
" Petition for Covered Business Method Patent Review by Samsung Electronics America, Inc., CBM2014-00192 (PTAB March 30, 2016, Order) (Plenzler, APJ) [read post]
12 Jun 2016, 2:43 pm
But Engine raises pretty much the same issues as app developers face.Pro-Samsung #4: Hispanic Leadership Fund, National Black Chamber of Commerce, National Grange (rural communities)Minority advocacy groups Hispanic Leadership Fund and National Black Chamber of Commerce once again teamed up with the National Grange of the Order of the Patrons of Husbandry (advocacy group representing America's farmers and rural communities) to voice their specific concerns over outsized design… [read post]
9 Oct 2009, 9:11 am
Samsung Electronics Company Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America Inc. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 7:13 pm
Patent Nos. 5,854,893 (the ‘893 patent), 6,237,025 (the ‘025 patent), 6,351,762 (the ‘762 patent), 7,185,054 (the ‘054 patent), and/or 7,206,809 (the ‘809 patent) (collectively, the “asserted patents”): ASUSTeK Computer, Inc. of Taiwan ASUS Computer International, Inc. of Fremont, California Pantech Co., Ltd. of South Korea Pantech Wireless, Inc. of Atlanta, Georgia Research In Motion Ltd. of Canada Research In Motion Corp. of… [read post]
22 May 2012, 7:15 am
James Gildea issued Order No. 68 granting-in-part Respondent Apple Inc. [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 3:48 am
Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., No. 18-189 (PTAB judges as principal officers; retroactive CBM reviews) Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 3:29 pm
In the Order, ALJ Essex granted a joint motion filed by Complainant BTG International and Respondents Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Semiconductor, Inc., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC, Apple, Inc., ASUStek Computer, Inc., ASUS Computer International, Inc., Dell Inc., Lenovo (United States) Inc., Lenovo (Singapore)… [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 7:58 pm
With the exception of certain kinds of standard-essential patents (for example, cellular standards patents), it's clear that the product will still be sold after being modified to work around the enforced patents, maybe after a minor disruption caused by the need to make those modifications.If products are named in an injunction order, they are only examples of infringement and do not limit the scope of an injunction that is worded like Judge Koh's two recent injunctions against… [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 5:20 pm
Ltd. and Murata Electronics North America, Inc. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 4:07 pm
Apple further states that on April 15, 2011, it filed suit against Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and related entities in the U.S. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 1:41 pm
By way of background, the Complainant in this investigation is OSRAM GmbH of Germany and the Respondents are Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. of Korea, Samsung Electronics America, Inc. of Ridgefield Park, New Jersey, Samsung LED Co., Ltd. of Korea, Samsung LED America, Inc. of Atlanta, Georgia, LG Electronics, Inc. of South Korea, LG Innotek Co., Ltd. of South Korea, LG Electronics… [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 5:48 am
I will then tell you what each side must prove to win on each of its contentions.As I previously explained, Apple seeks money damages from Samsung Electronics Company ("SEC"), Samsung Electronics America, Inc. [read post]
24 Dec 2010, 9:06 am
The Respondents are Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung International Inc., Samsung Semiconductor, Inc., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC, Shanghai Lenovo Electronic Co. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 4:32 pm
According to the Notice of Investigation, the ITC has identified the following entities as respondents in this investigation: Research In Motion Ltd. of Canada Research In Motion Corp. of Irving, Texas HTC Corporation of Taiwan HTC America, Inc. of Bellevue, Washington LG Electronics, Inc. of South Korea LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc. of Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey LG Electronics MobileComm U.S.A., Inc. of San Diego,… [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 11:23 am
Samsung Electronics America, Inc. [read post]
28 Aug 2009, 1:36 pm
The investigation is based on a July 31, 2009 complaint filed by Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. [read post]
