Search for: "Samsung Electronics Co. v. Apple Inc" Results 61 - 80 of 172
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Dec 2012, 10:25 am by John Presper
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et. al., Case No. 2:06-cv-0063, which involved, inter alia, the ‘359, ‘556 and ‘506 patents; and (2) Ericsson Inc. et al. v. [read post]
12 Oct 2012, 9:00 am by LTA-Editor
Photo Credit: CNET By Daniel Shickich Just weeks after a jury handed Apple Inc. a billion dollar victory over rival Samsung Electronics Co. in a patent infringement suit, Samsung is heading back to court, asking that the verdict be dismissed due to juror misconduct. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 7:58 pm by Florian Mueller
With the exception of certain kinds of standard-essential patents (for example, cellular standards patents), it's clear that the product will still be sold after being modified to work around the enforced patents, maybe after a minor disruption caused by the need to make those modifications.If products are named in an injunction order, they are only examples of infringement and do not limit the scope of an injunction that is worded like Judge Koh's two recent injunctions against… [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 4:00 am by Barry Sookman
Gawker Media files for bankruptcy after losing US$140.1 million Hulk Hogan privacy lawsuit https://t.co/Hnn5dg5QSZ -> Apple Inc. case against Samsung Electronics Co should go back to lower court: Justice Dept https://t.co/aQvyRu7CN5 -> The Digital North and the challenges with CASL https://t.co/SI1G6R9sSN -> Led Zeppelin Stars To appear In Court For Stairway To Heaven Copyright Trial https://t.co/k4UHu9XCzm -> Is Copyright Infringement in… [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 11:00 pm by Jani Ihalainen
The case of Samsung Electronics Co. v Apple Inc., dealt with design patents owned by Apple on aspects of the iPhone, in particular a black rectangular design (D618,677), the same with a bezel on a surrounding rim (D593,087), and a colourful grid of 16 icons on a black screen (D604,305). [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 2:08 am by war
The strength of Apple’s case Apple argued that Samsung’s importation and sale of the Galaxy Tab 10.1 would infringe: claim 6 of the “Touch Patent” (2005246219); and claims 1 and 55 of the “Heuristics Patent” (2007286532). [read post]