Search for: "Samsung Electronics Co. v. Apple Inc" Results 141 - 160 of 164
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jan 2015, 10:00 pm by Doug Austin
Grewal found time to preside over a case other than Apple v. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 7:49 am by Rob Robinson
Samsung – @LXBN Roundtable – http://bit.ly/MYoR4f (Jared Sulzdorf) Apple Expert Shines Light on Samsung Sales in U.S. - http://bit.ly/MWxSL5 (iTechPost) Apple v. [read post]
20 May 2011, 7:57 am by Stefanie Levine
Patent No. 6,887,616 entitled ELECTRODE UNIT AND SECONDARY BATTERY USING THE SAME and owned by Samsung SDI Co., LTD.  [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 9:16 am by Dennis Crouch
First Quality Baby Products, LLC, No. 15-927 (laches in patent cases) Awaiting Decision: Samsung Electronics Co. v. [read post]
18 Sep 2016, 6:03 pm by Dennis Crouch
First Quality Baby Products, LLC, No. 15-927 (laches in patent cases) Briefing: Samsung Electronics Co. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 3:09 am by Dennis Crouch
  === THE LIST=== 1. 2016-2016 Decisions: Design Patent Damages: Samsung Electronics Co. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 7:36 am by Vincent LoTempio
(see chart below World Wide Ownership of US Patents 2010) Top-50 US Patent Assignees in 2010 (As reported by IFI) International Business Machines Corp 5896 Samsung Electronics Co Ltd (Korea) 4551 Microsoft Corp 3094 Canon K K (Japan) 2552 Panasonic Corp (Japan) 2482 Toshiba Corp (Japan) 2246 Sony Corp (Japan) 2150 Intel Corp 1653 LG Electronics Inc (Korea) 1490 Hewlett-Packard Development Co L P 1480 … [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 6:05 am
Re-tooling a patent infringement suit aimed at Dell from 2007, Typhoon Touch Technology and co-plaintiff Nova Mobility Systems have added Apple, Fujitsu, Toshiba America, Lenovo U.S., Panasonic Corp. of North America, HTC America Inc., Palm Inc., Samsung Electronics America, Nokia Inc, and LG Electronics USA to its list of defendants. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 10:00 pm by Doug Austin
Argonaut Great Central Insurance Co., Louisiana Magistrate Judge Stephen C. [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 9:00 am
 The first is that probably the four highest profile design cases in the UK in recent years (Procter & Gamble Co v Reckitt Benckiser (UK) Ltd [2007] EWCA Civ 936, Dyson v Vax [2011] EWCA Civ 1206, Samsung Electronics (UK) Ltd v Apple Inc [2012] EWCA Civ 1339, and PMS International Limited v Magmatic Limited [2016] UKSC 12 (i.e. [read post]
20 Dec 2015, 4:00 am by Barry Sookman
  https://t.co/DZsJJ1JQeA -> CASL Anti-Spam Legislation – Will it Actually Halt Spam https://t.co/Zys0ALSlbj -> Samsung Electronics Co. v. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 12:29 am
However, he considered a number of cases, of which only a couple were of any assistance to him: ·         Samsung Electronics (UK) Ltd v Apple Inc [2012] EWCA Civ 729, noted by the IPKat here  - the dicta at para [49] were relevant and persuasive authority on when a stay may be refused on special grounds; and  ·         EMI (IP) Ltd v British Sky Broadcasting Group plc [2012] EWHC 1644 (Ch), a case which also referred to… [read post]