Search for: "Samsung Telecommunications America LLP"
Results 1 - 10
of 10
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jul 2015, 2:42 pm
Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC, United States District Court, Northern District of Texas, Case No. 3:13-CV-3599-N (the “Samsung Case”) In the Samsung Case, the Court focused on certain prior litigation when analyzing the relevant history of the prior representations: In particular, Samsung retained Powers and Cherensky to represent it in Samsung Elecs. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 2:42 pm
Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC, United States District Court, Northern District of Texas, Case No. 3:13-CV-3599-N (the “Samsung Case”) In the Samsung Case, the Court focused on certain prior litigation when analyzing the relevant history of the prior representations: In particular, Samsung retained Powers and Cherensky to represent it in Samsung Elecs. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 2:42 pm
Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC, United States District Court, Northern District of Texas, Case No. 3:13-CV-3599-N (the “Samsung Case”) In the Samsung Case, the Court focused on certain prior litigation when analyzing the relevant history of the prior representations: In particular, Samsung retained Powers and Cherensky to represent it in Samsung Elecs. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 12:40 pm
Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC, United States District Court, Northern District of Texas, Case No. 3:13-CV-3599-N (the “Samsung Case”) In the Samsung Case, the Court focused on certain prior litigation when analyzing the relevant history of the prior representations: In particular, Samsung retained Powers and Cherensky to represent it in Samsung Elecs. [read post]
24 Dec 2010, 9:06 am
The Respondents are Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung International Inc., Samsung Semiconductor, Inc., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC, Shanghai Lenovo Electronic Co. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 7:22 pm
The Respondents are Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung International Inc., Samsung Semiconductor, Inc., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC (collectively, “Samsung”), Shanghai Lenovo Electronic Co. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 8:00 pm
In the Order, ALJ Rogers granted a joint motion filed on January 29, 2010, by Complainant Saxon Innovations, LLC’s (“Saxon”), and Respondents Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLP (collectively, “Samsung”), and Palm, Inc. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 7:30 am
 Respondents Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLP (collectively, “Samsungâ€), Research In Motion, Ltd. and Research In Motion Corp. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 7:20 pm
 The order denied summary determination motions filed by Complainant Saxon Innovations, LLC (“Saxonâ€) and Respondents Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLP (collectively, “Samsungâ€) in Certain Electronic Devices, Including Handheld Wireless Communications Devices (Inv. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 9:03 am
In the Order, ALJ Rogers granted a motion to strike the supplemental expert report of Complainant Saxon Innovations, LLC's ("Saxon") expert witness filed by Respondents Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLP (collectively, "Samsung"). [read post]
