Search for: "Sanchez v. Immigration and Naturalization Service" Results 1 - 20 of 23
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Dec 2013, 8:41 am by Joel R. Brandes
On January 2, 2013, Gonzalez sent an e-mail to the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (“USCIS”), asking them to terminate Sanchez's immigrant visa petition. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 1:25 pm
As a result of the 1996 felony DUI conviction, the thenImmigration and Naturalization Service (INS) issued Peralta a Notice to Appear, charging him as removable for having been convicted of an aggravated felony “crime of violence. [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 10:51 am by Angelo A. Paparelli
Cutler At the urging of President Biden, two members of Congress – Senator Robert Menendez and Representative Linda Sanchez – introduced companion 353-page bills last month in the Senate and the House entitled the “U.S. [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 10:51 am by Angelo A. Paparelli
Cutler At the urging of President Biden, two members of Congress – Senator Robert Menendez and Representative Linda Sanchez – introduced companion 353-page bills last month in the Senate and the House entitled the “U.S. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 10:12 pm by Wolfgang Demino
To preserve the simplicity and speedy nature of the remedy, the applicable civil rules provide that "the court must adjudicate actual possession and not title. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 1:01 pm by Mark Walsh
Sanchez-Gomez comes before the justices, the questions presented are more procedural in nature, including whether the U.S. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 6:08 am
§ 236.1(e) (2003) (requiring the Immigration and Naturalization Service to comply with Article 36). [read post]
  I have also done extensive ethnographic work with asylum seekers, their attorneys and service providers, and human rights activists, as well as interviews with U.S. asylum officers and U.S. immigration judges. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 3:08 pm by Anna Christensen
HolderDocket: 09-1211Issue(s): (1) Whether Section 304(b) of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act is inapplicable to pre-enactment convictions of all immigrants whose convictions predate IIRIRA’s enactment, or whether the section’s retroactivity instead (a) turns on an immigrant’s subjective reliance; (b) turns on objectively reasonable reliance; or (c) is categorically inapplicable to convictions obtained at trial; and… [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
The New York Times and Politico petitioned Howell to unseal portions of the grand jury proceedings in October, citing the historic nature of the secret rulings she had issued. [read post]
13 May 2008, 1:35 pm
Mir, No. 05-4985, 05-4989 Convictions for immigration fraud are affirmed over defendant's principal claim that that conversations two witnesses initiated with him at the government's behest violated his Sixth Amendment right to counsel because those conversations occurred after defendant had been indicted on the immigration fraud counts. [read post]