Search for: "Sandifer v. United States Steel Corp" Results 1 - 20 of 34
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Nov 2013, 3:53 pm by Adam Kielich
This month the Supreme Court of the United States will hear oral arguments on Sandifer v. [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 8:00 am by Steven G. Pearl
United States Steel Corp., ___ U.S. ___ (1/27/14), the Supreme Court of the United States considered the meaning of the phrase "changing clothes" in the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). 29 U.S.C. section 201 et seq. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 8:12 pm by Orin Kerr
United States Steel Corp. [read post]
8 Nov 2013, 2:13 pm by Oyez Project
United States Steel Corporation Walden v. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 7:49 am by SupremeCourtHaiku
Union may agree That donning protective gear Is like changing clothes Opinion [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 8:23 am by Greg Mersol
United States Steel Corp., Case No. 12-417 (Jan. 27, 2014), addressing donning and doffing claims in the context of a unionized steel mill. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 9:53 am by Tawny Alvarez
On Monday, January 27, 2014, the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in Sandifer v. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 8:13 am by Peter J. Dugan
United States Steel Corp., which clarified what it means for an employee to be “changing clothes” under Section 3(o) of the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”). [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 4:31 am by Jon Hyman
United States Steel Corp., which asks under what circumstances employers are required to treat as compensable the time employees spend putting on and taking off protective clothing. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 5:35 am by Amy Howe
  The first opinion came in Air Wisconsin Airlines Corp. v. [read post]