Search for: "Sandifer v. United States Steel Corp."
Results 21 - 31
of 31
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Feb 2014, 8:13 am
United States Steel Corp., which clarified what it means for an employee to be “changing clothes” under Section 3(o) of the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”). [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 10:47 am
Sandifer v. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 10:49 am
United States Steel Corp., the Supreme Court addressed, in an unanimous opinion, the issue of whether a collective bargaining agreement covering union workers could exclude the covered workers from pay for certain types of donning and duffing time. [read post]
18 Jan 2019, 9:57 am
United States Steel Corp., 571 U. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 12:40 pm
United States Steel Corp. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 6:40 am
United States Steel Corp., 632 F.Supp.2d 398, 412-13 (W.D.Pa.2009) (“Section 203(o) relates to the compensability of time spent donning, doffing, and washing in the collective-bargaining process. [read post]
20 Jan 2019, 11:43 pm
See United States v. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 8:27 am
United States Steel Corp., 134 S. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 8:27 am
United States Steel Corp., 134 S. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 6:04 am
United States Steel Corp., issued earlier this year. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 6:03 pm
United States Steel Corp., 571 U.S. 220, 227 (2014) (citation omitted). [read post]
