Search for: "Sandy Levinson"
Results 301 - 320
of 582
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jan 2022, 6:30 am
Over a decade ago, in a more innocent time, Sandy Levinson and I developed a definition and typology of constitutional crises. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 6:30 am
This post was prepared for a roundtable on Wrestling with Religious Diversity, convened as part of LevinsonFest 2022—a year-long series gathering scholars from diverse disciplines and viewpoints to reflect on Sandy Levinson’s influential work in constitutional law. [read post]
28 Jul 2022, 6:30 am
John Olusegun Adenitire I In the last chapter of Wrestling with Diversity, Sandy Levinson and Rachel Levinson ask ‘why should practices rooted in religious belief be treated differently than "cultural norms," whether for good (…) or potentially even for ill (…)? [read post]
21 Apr 2022, 7:30 am
Lobbying and Petitioning – Responses to Levinson Sandy Levinson brings his forceful acumen and his ever youthful, unbridled intellectual curiosity to the subject of petitioning. [read post]
15 Jun 2019, 8:00 am
The posts of Ann Southworth, Sandy Levinson, Steve Griffin in particular do the book the great justice of describing it accurately, and underlining precisely what it aspires to do, and does. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 6:30 am
This post was prepared for a roundtable on Civic Education, convened as part of LevinsonFest 2022—a year-long series gathering scholars from diverse disciplines and viewpoints to reflect on Sandy Levinson’s influential work in constitutional law. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 6:30 am
See Levinson v. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 8:54 am
Here. [read post]
13 Jun 2009, 10:33 am
- Judge Frank Easterbrook Sandy Levinson discusses the issues I wrote about yesterday - the dissonance between the insistence by extreme conservatives that the individual 2nd Amendment rights discovered by the Roberts Court in Heller be incorporated into the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment and their stated commitment to the New Federalism. [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 9:24 am
Sandy Levinson was also a participant in the Balkinization symposium. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 5:53 am
Last week I attended a splendid conference organized by Sandy Levinson and held at the University of Texas. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 7:30 am
Sandy also recently issued a challenge to the Volokh Conspiracy that I answered here and here.Both panels are timely and feature a wide range of viewpoints (as well as a wide range of bloggers). [read post]
18 May 2022, 8:30 am
Few scholars have deepened our understanding of these distinct pillars of American civic religion and memory—the nation’s sacrosanct monuments and its sacred scripture—as much as Sandy Levinson. [read post]
25 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
Senate: today a majority of the U.S. population, concentrated in 9 states, is represented by a very small minority of 18% of Senate seats (Levinson 2010; Levinson and Levinson 2019, 39; Levinson and Balkin 2019, 178). [read post]
6 Jun 2007, 10:50 pm
As Sandy and I have noted, the next President, whoever he or she will be, will probably try to maintain many of George W. [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 6:30 am
Sincere thanks to Jack Balkin for hosting this symposium on Rich Friedman’s and my book, and to Yuval Abrams, Jodi Balsam, Mark Graber, and Sandy Levinson for their incisive and generous commentaries. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 6:41 am
Earlier this week, in his Ideas column in the Boston Globe, Leon Neyfakh considered the possibility of a bipartisan executive, as well as other remedies that have been proposed for the dysfunction in our national government, including Sandy Levinson’s “Undemocratic Constitution” and the “unbundled executive” of Christopher Berry and Jacob Gersen. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 4:18 pm
Sandy Levinson, University of Texas Law School Prof. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 8:55 am
It features contributions by Sandy Levinson, Leslie Friedman Goldstein, Julie Novkov, Mark Graber, John Compton, and me. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 5:03 pm
[Update: Sandy Levinson weighs in, calling this a textbook example of unconstitutional conditions, the type that would outrage liberals if it were attached to, for example, NEA funds). [read post]
