Search for: "Sandy Levinson" Results 301 - 320 of 528
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2011, 2:36 pm by Lawrence Solum
Introduction The counter-majoritarian difficulty may be the best known problem in constitutional theory. [read post]
20 May 2011, 5:47 am by Howard Wasserman
There is a nice discussion going at Balkinization about the successful "filibuster" of Goodwin Liu's nomination to the Ninth Circuit, among Jason Mazzone, Sandy Levinson, and Jack Balkin. [read post]
19 May 2011, 5:20 pm by Jason Mazzone
My distinguished colleague-in-blogging, Sandy Levinson, says about my earlier post on the Goodwin Liu vote today that I'm wrong.I'm not ready to agree with that.Professor Levinson says 52 votes on cloture don't approach a negative vote on the merits and he complains of the "tyranny of the egregious Senate minority" that killed the Liu nomination. [read post]
7 May 2011, 3:01 pm by Northwestern University Law Review
Professor Sandy Levinson continues the debate with a critique of Professor Barnett’s proposed Repeal Amendment, which would allow the legislatures of two-thirds of all states to repeal any congressional legislation. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 7:24 pm by Rick.Hasen@lls.edu
And Sandy Levinson blogs on judicial elections generally, including Wisconsin.... [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 9:21 am by Tom Smith
Much enthusiasm for Fareed Zakaria's critique of the Constitution from Sandy Levinson over at Balkinization. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 5:37 am by Howard Wasserman
Sandy Levinson suggests the election is a "good thing," although he calls the October election in which Iowa voters unseated three Supreme Court justices as a response to the same-sex marriage decision "less good," at least from his political perspective. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 11:59 am by JB
In 2006, Sandy Levinson and I predicted that the next president, whether Democratic or Republican, would ratify and continue many of President George W. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 3:59 am by Guest Blogger
David BeattyAt the end of their dialogue on the theory and structure of the U.S. constitution Randy Barnett and Sandy Levinson raise an interesting point. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 6:15 pm by JB
Here is a Bloggingheads diavlog between Sandy Levinson and Randy Barnett on several issues of constitutional theory and structure, including the Senate, the Tea Party, and a discussion of Randy's proposed Repeal Amendment: [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 10:45 am by Randy Barnett
(Randy Barnett) My Bloggingheads diavlog with my friend Texas law professor Sandy Levinson was posted yesterday. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 10:18 am by Jamal Greene
Korematsu is almost universally acknowledged among serious constitutional lawyers to have been not just wrong, but so egregiously wrong as to warrant inclusion in what Jack Balkin, Sandy Levinson, and others have termed the “anticanon” of U.S. constitutional law. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 7:30 am by Ilya Somin
Sandy also recently issued a challenge to the Volokh Conspiracy that I answered here and here.Both panels are timely and feature a wide range of viewpoints (as well as a wide range of bloggers). [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 2:04 pm by Orin Kerr
(Orin Kerr) Sandy Levinson offers a historical perspective on the tendency some have to treat the Constitution as a sort of Biblical document. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 7:14 am by JB
CSPAN recently interviewed Sandy Levinson about his 1988 book, Constitutional Faith.And here is a lecture Sandy gave in Cambridge, Massachusetts entitled: Renewing Democracy: How Much Do Elections Matter? [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 7:08 pm by Steve Bainbridge
 Some people, like Sandy Levinson, argue that this is because those states have dysfunctional constitutions. [read post]