Search for: "Sandy Levinson"
Results 321 - 340
of 561
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Sep 2011, 9:50 am
No, this is not a Rick roll Rick Perry apparently supports something like Paul Carrington's proposal-- joined by legal academics across the ideological spectrum, including Sandy Levinson and myself--for 18 year "term limits" for Supreme Court Justices. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 6:08 am
If Sandy Levinson had been around then, he probably would have denounced the "egregious House of Representatives. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 9:29 am
This question was posed for me by Dan Solove’s post on “Losing Our Religion,” as well as by the juxtaposition between Jack’s book and Sandy Levinson’s Our Undemocratic Constitution, works that share many sympathies yet appear to reach opposite conclusions. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 11:43 am
The most important constitutional question in 2011, as Sandy Levinson never tires of reminding us, is whether the Constitution of the United States (or many state constitutions) provides a means of staffing the government and making rules that enables government to do a decent job filling in potholes. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 6:21 pm
I think this is yet another area where Jack’s analogy (or really, Sandy Levinson’s analogy, which Jack credits generously) between constitutional faith and religious faith, between the Bible and the Constitution, is highly instructive. [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 7:42 pm
Sandy Levinson made this point at Balkinization some time ago. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 8:54 am
Here. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 1:03 pm
Sandy Levinson comments on Tom Friedman’s new column on Americans Elect. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 7:32 am
I wrote the foreword, Sandy Levinson wrote the afterword, and an all-star cast including Randy Barnett, Brannon Denning, Richard Epstein, Tim Lynch, Rob Natelson, and too many other luminaries to mention contributed the stuff in between. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 8:59 am
Over at Balkinization, Sandy Levinson characterized this plan as "delegation run riot," but he seems to have misunderstood the proposal. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 4:59 pm
Following up on Sandy’s post, McConnell’s trial balloon today was, I believe, several degrees more cynical than Sandy suggests. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 6:10 pm
In another post for Balkinization, University of Texas at Austin law professor Sandy Levinson suggests that Obama take the alternative route of educating the public “about the unconstitutional behavior of his Republican adversaries. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 2:25 pm
Sandy Levinson has posted interesting reflections on our tendency to “absolutize” the public debt. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 2:25 pm
Sandy Levinson has posted interesting reflections on our tendency to "absolutize" the public debt. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 7:44 am
One of my pet peeves – and an inspiration for my current project – is that the court-centered obsessions of law professors (much lamented by Sandy Levinson, amongst others) have led us to believe that the phrase “constitutional theory” applies only to theories advanced to advise judges about the “best” or “only legitimate way” to interpret the constitutional text. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 7:21 pm
Also, at Balkinization, Sandy Levinson writes a post titled Life In A Constitutional Dictatorship: It is now crystal clear that Obama does not represent a true repudiation of the Bush Administration, but, rather, a (somewhat) kindler and gentler version of its claims vis-a-vis presidential power and what is defined by the White House as "national security. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 8:26 am
Balkinization - "American heroes" [by Sandy Levinson] Tuesday, June 14, 2011. [read post]
22 May 2011, 2:36 pm
Introduction The counter-majoritarian difficulty may be the best known problem in constitutional theory. [read post]
20 May 2011, 5:47 am
There is a nice discussion going at Balkinization about the successful "filibuster" of Goodwin Liu's nomination to the Ninth Circuit, among Jason Mazzone, Sandy Levinson, and Jack Balkin. [read post]
19 May 2011, 5:20 pm
My distinguished colleague-in-blogging, Sandy Levinson, says about my earlier post on the Goodwin Liu vote today that I'm wrong.I'm not ready to agree with that.Professor Levinson says 52 votes on cloture don't approach a negative vote on the merits and he complains of the "tyranny of the egregious Senate minority" that killed the Liu nomination. [read post]
