Search for: "Sandy Levinson"
Results 321 - 340
of 573
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Mar 2012, 7:01 am
I'll do more than one post on this, but for now I want to discuss (in the spirit of Sandy Levinson) how Justice Fortas thought that the Constitution should be amended to limit the power of the Presidency. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 8:27 pm
I agree with much of what Sandy says in this post. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 3:40 pm
Even if you agree — as non-libertarian lefty Sandy Levinson does — that the southern states may have been right about the legality of secession, there’s nothing libertarian about a society built on slavery. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 1:02 pm
I don't see this as either a good or bad thing--unless, I suppose, like Sandy Levinson, one has given up on the American Constitution itself and is looking for some fresh drafting advice. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 12:31 pm
Following my previous post on why for-profit corporations cannot be persons for purposes of the Thirteenth Amendment, Sandy Levinson reminded me of another important fact. [read post]
28 Jan 2012, 10:38 am
Obviously it does not, since it has not, but the inquiry as to why motivates a forthcoming paper by Jack Balkin and Sandy Levinson. [read post]
28 Jan 2012, 7:27 am
Yesterday Columbia Law Review held a symposium on the Thirteenth Amendment, at which Sandy Levinson and I presented a paper we are currently working on (I hope to post a draft soon).As we explain in the paper, while the Fourteenth Amendment has been the font of a huge caselaw, and has been construed in ways that far outstrip its original purposes and understandings, the Thirteenth Amendment has been treated very differently. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 12:52 pm
Sandy Levinson blogs. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 5:11 am
I did until recently, and am still unpersuaded by Sandy Levinson's arguments against doing so. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 12:25 pm
Here is the abstract: The following essay pays tribute to Sandy Levinson's thoughts on constitutional compromises by paying tribute to the thoughts on constitutional compromises by our common mentor, Walter Murphy. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 8:01 pm
Texas Law, Business, and Economics Dan Rodriguez (Texas Law) Touro Sandy V. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 11:03 am
The afternoon session of Day 2 of the conference begins with introductory remarks from Gabby Blum, the moderator of the afternoon’s first panel. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 9:50 am
No, this is not a Rick roll Rick Perry apparently supports something like Paul Carrington's proposal-- joined by legal academics across the ideological spectrum, including Sandy Levinson and myself--for 18 year "term limits" for Supreme Court Justices. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 6:08 am
If Sandy Levinson had been around then, he probably would have denounced the "egregious House of Representatives. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 9:29 am
This question was posed for me by Dan Solove’s post on “Losing Our Religion,” as well as by the juxtaposition between Jack’s book and Sandy Levinson’s Our Undemocratic Constitution, works that share many sympathies yet appear to reach opposite conclusions. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 11:43 am
The most important constitutional question in 2011, as Sandy Levinson never tires of reminding us, is whether the Constitution of the United States (or many state constitutions) provides a means of staffing the government and making rules that enables government to do a decent job filling in potholes. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 6:21 pm
I think this is yet another area where Jack’s analogy (or really, Sandy Levinson’s analogy, which Jack credits generously) between constitutional faith and religious faith, between the Bible and the Constitution, is highly instructive. [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 7:42 pm
Sandy Levinson made this point at Balkinization some time ago. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 8:54 am
Here. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 1:03 pm
Sandy Levinson comments on Tom Friedman’s new column on Americans Elect. [read post]
