Search for: "Sandy Levinson" Results 321 - 340 of 582
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 May 2012, 3:33 pm by constitutional lawblogger
As ConLawProf Sandy Levinson rightly observes in an Op-Ed in today's NYT, "the Constitution is enveloped in near religious veneration. [read post]
29 May 2012, 10:28 am by Big Tent Democrat
Consider Sandy Levinson's piece, also in today's New York Times. [read post]
28 May 2012, 8:12 pm by Rick Hasen
Sandy Levinson blogs at NYT’s Campaign Stops blog. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 7:06 am by Kiran Bhat
” Peter Wallsten and Robert Barnes of the Washington Post, Brooks Jackson of (via USA Today), and Mike Sacks of the Huffington Post also have coverage of the President’s remarks, while Sandy Levinson has commentary at Balkinization. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 6:48 am by Marc DeGirolami
" But the best piece of musico-legal synthesis of all time must surely be Jack Balkin and Sandy Levinson's "Law, Music, and Other Performing Arts" back in 1991. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 7:45 am by Rick Hasen
Sandy Levinson, in a post at Balkinization on legitimacy and the Supreme Court, writes: “The University of Texas Law School is hosting a two-day conference on “Countermajoritarianism and the Court” tomorrow and Saturday, sparked in part by an article in the recent Supreme Court Review by Rick Pildes suggesting that the “countermajoritarian difficulty” is alive and well, as witnessed most prominently in Citizens United, opposed by roughly 80% of the… [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 5:29 am by Joshua Matz
  Fazal Khan of ACS Blog and David Paul of the Huffington Post warn that an opinion invalidating the ACA risks compromising the Court’s legitimacy, while at Balkanization, Sandy Levinson questions whether a decision invaliding the opinion would actually generate a backlash. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 9:28 am by Kiran Bhat
Cato@Liberty, David Koppel of the Volokh Conspiracy, and Jack Balkin, Neil Siegel, and Sandy Levinson at Balkinzation, all offer thoughts on a “limiting principle” for congressional power. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 7:01 am by Gerard N. Magliocca
I'll do more than one post on this, but for now I want to discuss (in the spirit of Sandy Levinson) how Justice Fortas thought that the Constitution should be amended to limit the power of the Presidency. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 8:27 pm by Ilya Somin
I agree with much of what Sandy says in this post. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 3:40 pm by Glenn Reynolds
Even if you agree — as non-libertarian lefty Sandy Levinson does — that the southern states may have been right about the legality of secession, there’s nothing libertarian about a society built on slavery. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 1:02 pm by Paul Horwitz
 I don't see this as either a good or bad thing--unless, I suppose, like Sandy Levinson, one has given up on the American Constitution itself and is looking for some fresh drafting advice. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 12:31 pm by JB
Following my previous post on why for-profit corporations cannot be persons for purposes of the Thirteenth Amendment, Sandy Levinson reminded me of another important fact. [read post]
28 Jan 2012, 10:38 am by Michael Froomkin
Obviously it does not, since it has not, but the inquiry as to why motivates a forthcoming paper by Jack Balkin and Sandy Levinson. [read post]
28 Jan 2012, 7:27 am by JB
Yesterday Columbia Law Review held a symposium on the Thirteenth Amendment, at which Sandy Levinson and I presented a paper we are currently working on (I hope to post a draft soon).As we explain in the paper, while the Fourteenth Amendment has been the font of a huge caselaw, and has been construed in ways that far outstrip its original purposes and understandings, the Thirteenth Amendment has been treated very differently. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 5:11 am by Paul Horwitz
 I did until recently, and am still unpersuaded by Sandy Levinson's arguments against doing so. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 12:25 pm by Lawrence Solum
Here is the abstract: The following essay pays tribute to Sandy Levinson's thoughts on constitutional compromises by paying tribute to the thoughts on constitutional compromises by our common mentor, Walter Murphy. [read post]