Search for: "Sandy Levinson"
Results 341 - 360
of 548
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Feb 2013, 7:14 am
The commentary is from Hank Chambers, Ray Diamond, Paul Finkelman, Leslie Harris, and Sandy Levinson. [read post]
31 Dec 2006, 9:11 am
Sandy Levinson's Our Undemocratic Constitution (see sidebar to right) has received much praise. [read post]
1 May 2009, 6:10 pm
Nita Farahany has posted the following paper to SSRN: "Law and Behavioral Morality" NOMOS LII: EVOLUTION AND MORALITY, Sandy Levinson, ed., 2009Vanderbilt Public Law Research Paper No. 09-03 NITA A. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 8:55 am
Some people, like Sandy Levinson, argue that this is because those states have dysfunctional constitutions. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 7:01 am
I'll do more than one post on this, but for now I want to discuss (in the spirit of Sandy Levinson) how Justice Fortas thought that the Constitution should be amended to limit the power of the Presidency. [read post]
21 May 2007, 4:24 pm
At Balkinization, Jack Balkin has this post discussing how Tom's analysis supports his and Sandy Levinson's theory of partisan entrenchment; and at Talking Points Memo, Steve Benen weighs in here. [read post]
9 Aug 2007, 2:26 pm
The paper suggests that constitutional law has a substantial effect explaining legal agreements in the face of policy disagreements (would Sandy Levinson's polemics against the constitution make sense in a world in which constitutions meant anything) and explaining why constitutional conflicts are over some matters and not others. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 9:18 am
” That includes people like Larry Tribe, and Sandy Levinson, whose 1992 Yale Law Journal essay, The Embarrassing Second Amendment, really kicked things off by signaling to the legal academy that it was okay to write about this. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 6:08 am
If Sandy Levinson had been around then, he probably would have denounced the "egregious House of Representatives. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 10:12 am
On the blog Balkinization, professors Jason Mazzone and Sandy Levinson engaged in a heated discussion as to the proper interpretation of the Supreme Court’s decision in Miranda. [read post]
30 May 2008, 12:17 pm
If I remember correctly, Sandy Levinson suggested that the argument is, in today's conditions, pretty much irrelevant to the school-voucher and charitable-choice questions. [read post]
5 May 2021, 3:30 am
This is the concern animating Leah Litman’s powerful and passionate recent article – a contribution to a symposium on Jack Balkin and Sandy Levinson’s book, Democracy and Dysfunction. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 5:48 am
At Balkinization, Sandy Levinson argues that Linda Greenhouse’s suggestion that the Court has effectively imposed a lower standard for ineffective assistance of counsel in death penalty appeals for veterans could be seen as a form of affirmative action. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 6:51 am
However, Harcourt himself advocates the "legalize and regulate" approach since the necessity defense is just a way to "legalize and regulate," as we pointed out in the article, repeating a point made by Sandy Levinson several years ago. [read post]
6 Feb 2010, 4:44 pm
For example, Sandy Levinson has referred to him as an "extortionate thug" on the Balkinization Blog, while Times columnist Gail Collins ridiculed his hold as "a dramatic gesture, one Shelby must have felt was so important that he took time out from his normal duties blocking all progress on creating a consumer protection agency for financial products. [read post]
16 May 2016, 4:29 am
A good illustration of the exemplary analogy is Sandy Levinson’s recent post on Balkinization (and oped in the Dallas Morning News), in which he praises Alexander Hamilton’s support for Thomas Jefferson over Aaron Burr, following the electoral college tie in the election of 1800. [read post]
9 Jun 2022, 6:30 am
This post was prepared for a roundtable on Constitutional Faith and Veneration, convened as part of LevinsonFest 2022—a year-long series gathering scholars from diverse disciplines and viewpoints to reflect on Sandy Levinson’s influential work in constitutional law. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 10:33 am
I do have some quibbles with Levinson’s discussion. [read post]
8 Jul 2021, 6:00 am
Second, my thanks to Jack Balkin and to the participants in this symposium: Jack Rakove, Sandy Levinson, Franita Tolson, Ned Foley, and Jesse Wegman. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 6:18 am
In a post at Balkinization discussing when filibusters are justified, Sandy Levinson offers a critique of Senator Lindsey Graham’s explanation for why he will vote to confirm Elena Kagan. [read post]
