Search for: "Sandy Levinson"
Results 341 - 360
of 580
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 May 2023, 8:00 am
In 2009 Sandy Levinson and I wrote an article in the University of Pennsylvania Law Review, which offered a typology of constitutional crises. [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 2:35 am
-- Sanford Levinson, Our Undemocratic Constitution, Oxford University Press 2006 [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 6:30 am
Owen Fiss, Sandy Levinson, Ronald Dworkin, Stanley Fish, Gerry Graff, Walter Michaels, all of whom glance sideways at Judge Posner; each with a connection to literature and the liberal arts, each a Jew of a certain age. [read post]
18 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
This post was prepared for a roundtable on Comparative Constitutional Design, convened as part of LevinsonFest 2022—a year-long series gathering scholars from diverse disciplines and viewpoints to reflect on Sandy Levinson’s influential work in constitutional law. [read post]
22 Dec 2007, 8:20 am
Roosevelt's effort to forge a purer coalition stalled his program completely.For the past year, my friend and co-blogger Sandy Levinson has called for a political movement for constitutional reform. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 3:34 pm
"I agree with Sandy on one thing: Senator Gillibrand's response to the story is weak. [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 10:05 am
In fact, my friend Sandy Levinson has argued that there are many parts of our Constitution that should be regarded as dealbreakers. [read post]
12 May 2020, 6:30 am
Sandy Levinson shrewdly notes that The Partisan Republic does not fit easily into the most familiar models of scholarship we have become accustomed to as academics. [read post]
14 Apr 2019, 5:00 am
We also discuss important differences between the more ideological Republican party and the more constituent-driven Democratic party; these differences are critical in understanding Reagan Attorney General Ed Meese’s transformative role in shaping legal policy through his embrace of the then-fledgling Federalist Society (an observation that is prominently featured in Sandy Levinson’s and Jack Balkin’s posts). [read post]
8 May 2019, 6:30 am
For the symposium on Sanford Levinson and Jack M. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
, convened as part of LevinsonFest 2022—a year-long series gathering scholars from diverse disciplines and viewpoints to reflect on Sandy Levinson’s influential work in constitutional law. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
Zietlow Sandy Levinson is always urging constitutional scholars to think about the parts of the constitution that we usually don’t talk about, including the parts that set up the structure of our government. [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 7:42 pm
Sandy Levinson made this point at Balkinization some time ago. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 5:48 am
At Balkinization, Sandy Levinson argues that Linda Greenhouse’s suggestion that the Court has effectively imposed a lower standard for ineffective assistance of counsel in death penalty appeals for veterans could be seen as a form of affirmative action. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 10:12 am
On the blog Balkinization, professors Jason Mazzone and Sandy Levinson engaged in a heated discussion as to the proper interpretation of the Supreme Court’s decision in Miranda. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 6:08 am
If Sandy Levinson had been around then, he probably would have denounced the "egregious House of Representatives. [read post]
6 Feb 2010, 4:44 pm
For example, Sandy Levinson has referred to him as an "extortionate thug" on the Balkinization Blog, while Times columnist Gail Collins ridiculed his hold as "a dramatic gesture, one Shelby must have felt was so important that he took time out from his normal duties blocking all progress on creating a consumer protection agency for financial products. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 6:59 am
I will be on the kick-off panel with professors Pam Karlan, Sandy Levinson & David Strauss. [read post]
30 May 2008, 12:17 pm
If I remember correctly, Sandy Levinson suggested that the argument is, in today's conditions, pretty much irrelevant to the school-voucher and charitable-choice questions. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 7:01 am
I'll do more than one post on this, but for now I want to discuss (in the spirit of Sandy Levinson) how Justice Fortas thought that the Constitution should be amended to limit the power of the Presidency. [read post]
